期刊文献+

内窥镜下后路腰椎椎体间融合附加单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的临床初探 被引量:4

Analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation and strategies of its microsurgical reconstruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]初步探讨内窥镜下后路腰椎椎体间融合(PLIF)附加单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的临床应用价值。[方法]对2005年7月~2008年9月本科采用内窥镜下PLIF附加单侧椎弓根螺钉固定手术的32例患者、传统开放双侧椎弓根螺钉固定手术的37例患者的临床结果进行评价。随访时间24~37个月,平均32.4个月。对比术中出血量、术后引流量、手术时间及术后住院日;对比术前、术后的腰痛视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和日本矫形外科协会(JOA)下腰痛评分;观察并发症的发生及术后椎间融合情况。[结果]单侧组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后住院时间均少于双侧组(P<0.05)。单侧组术后第3 d腰痛VAS评分低于双侧组(P=0.016)。单侧组术后优良率为100%(32例),椎间融合率为93.8%(30例),并发症发生率为9.4%(3例),与双侧组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]对于单节段病变且只需要单侧操作即可完成减压和椎间融合、而非手术侧结构完整者而言,内窥镜下PLIF附加单侧椎弓根螺钉固定是一种可供临床选择的微创手术方式。 [Objective] To evaluate the efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with unilateral pedicle screw fixation on the lumbar stability and the strategies of its reconstruction performed with microendoscopic approach. [ Methods] A consecutive series of 69 patients who underwent one - level PLIF procedure ( 32 cases performed with unilateral pedicle screw fix- ation and 37 cases with traditional open approach) from July 2005 to September 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. The following data were compared between 2 groups with 24 to 37 months follow - up : estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage, surgical time, length of hospital stay, postoperative back pain by visual analogue scale, complications, and the clinical and radiographic results. [ Results ] The unilateral approach was found to have a significantly less blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shor- ter surgical time, less postoperative back pain, shorter recovery time and shorter length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the aspects of the complications and the clinical and radiographic results. [ Conclusion ] There are optional strategies for suitable patients with one - level pathological changes, unilateral discectomy, spinal nerve root decom- pression, lumbar interbody fusion, and integral contralateral construction, by using the one -level PLIF with unilateral fixation performed with microendoscopic approach.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第23期2113-2116,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:31070876 81071493)
关键词 内窥镜脊柱外科 椎体间融合术 腰椎 microendoscopic spine surgery, interbody fusion, lumbar
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kimura H,Shikata J,Odate S. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion:analysis of 1070 cases[J].Spine,2012.1164-1169. 被引量:1
  • 2Kiapour A,Ambati D,Hoy RW. Effect of graded facetectomy on biomechanics of Dynesys dynamic stabilization system[J].Spine,2012.581-589. 被引量:1
  • 3Xue H,Tu Y,Cai M. Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases[J].Spine Journal,2012.209-215. 被引量:1
  • 4Patil SS,Rawall S,Nagad P. Outcome of single level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion using corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips[J].Indian J Orthop,2011.500-503. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen SH,Lin SC,Tsai WC. Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after decompressive surgery-a finite element analvsis[J].BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,2012.72. 被引量:1
  • 6王运涛,吴小涛,陈辉,李永刚,洪鑫.内镜下单节段后路腰椎椎体间融合术临床分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2007,30(6):413-416. 被引量:5
  • 7Lai PL,Chen LH,Niu CC. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation[J].Spine,2004.2527-2532. 被引量:1
  • 8梁博伟,李宁宁,胡朝晖,孙宏志,唐运鹏.多裂肌间隙入路单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗特殊类型腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(7):589-593. 被引量:15
  • 9Kim JG,Jin YJ,Chung SK. Unilateral augmented pedicle screw fixation for foraminal stenosis[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2009.5-10. 被引量:1
  • 10Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion[J].Spine,2000.1843-1847. 被引量:1

二级参考文献28

  • 1陆晓文,李明,侯铁胜,羊国民,桑井贵.显微椎间盘镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症失败病例分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2005,28(3):267-268. 被引量:11
  • 2冯燕翔,林一峰,麦伟,吴养,李志丹,李涛,颜志坚.后路显微椎间盘镜治疗腰椎间盘突出并侧隐窝狭窄症[J].中华显微外科杂志,2006,29(3):227-228. 被引量:14
  • 3李佛保,郑召民.腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗有必要放置椎间融合器吗?[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(17):1359-1360. 被引量:6
  • 4Pechlivanis I,Kiriyanthan G,Engelhardt M,et al.Percutaneousplacement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bonemounted miniature robotic system:first experiences and accuracy ofscrew placement[J].Spine,2009,4:392-398. 被引量:1
  • 5Regev GJ,Lee YP,Taylor WR,et al.Nerve injury to the posteriorrami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws:compari-son of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion tech-niques[J].Spine,2009,11:1239-1242. 被引量:1
  • 6Lehmann W,Ushmaev A,Ruecker A,et al.Comparison of open ver-sus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model[J].EurSpine J,2008,6:857-863. 被引量:1
  • 7Gepstein R,Shabat S,Reichel M,et al.Treatment of postdiscectomylow back pain by percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusionversus open posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws[J].Spine,2008,5:741-746. 被引量:1
  • 8Kotil K,Tunckale T,Tatar Z,et al.Serum creatine phosphokinaseactivity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle:a prospec-tive randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with orwithout retraction[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2007,2:121-125. 被引量:1
  • 9Kim CW.Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery:pre-vention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery[J].Spine,2010,26:281-286. 被引量:1
  • 10Fan S,Hu Z,Zhao F,et al.Multifidus muscle changes and clinicaleffects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion:minimallyinvasive procedure versus conventional open approach[J].EurSpine J,2010,2:316-324. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部