期刊文献+

DWI判断卵巢上皮源性囊实性肿瘤性质的探讨 被引量:5

Diffusion-weighted imaging in differenting the nature of ovarian epithelial tumors with solid and cystic components
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨磁共振扩散加权成像结合表观扩散系数(ADC)值对鉴别良恶性卵巢上皮囊实性肿瘤的价值。方法:对经手术病理证实的127例卵巢上皮起源的囊实性肿瘤患者的常规MRI、DWI检查资料和肿瘤实体部分的ADC测量值进行回顾性分析,131个病灶中46个为良性囊腺瘤,85个为恶性囊腺瘤。结果:良性组卵巢肿瘤实质部分的平均ADC值为(1.69±0.25)×10-3 mm2/s,恶性组为(1.03±0.22)×10-3 mm2/s,两组间ADC值差异有极显著性意义(P<0.001)。以(1.25×10-3)mm2/s作为诊断良恶性肿瘤的阈值,则敏感度、特异度和总体符合率分别为90.1%、89.9%和92.4%。结论:常规MRI检查鉴别卵巢表面上皮良恶肿瘤存在困难时,辅以扩散加权成像和ADC值测量有助于进一步判断肿瘤的良恶性。 Objective:To assess the usefulness of diffusiowweighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coeffi- cient (ADC) value measurement in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors with cystic and solid components. Methods: The conventional MR imaging (MRI),DWI and the ADC values of solid components of 131 ovarian epithelial tumors confirmed by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 131 tumors, there were 46 be- nign and 85 malignant cystadenomas. The ADC values of solid components were calculated and analyzed statistically. Results:The mean ADC value of solid components in benign ovarian epithelial tumors was (1.69±0.25)×10-3mm2/s, in malignant ovarian epithelial tumors was ( 1. 03 ± 0. 22 )×10-3 mm2 /s, with significant statistic difference (P 〈 0. 001 ). Taking the ADC value of (1. 25×10-3) mm2/s as the threshold value for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 90.1%, 89.9 % and 92.4 % respectively. Conclusion : When differentiation of benign or malignant ovarian epithelial tumors was difficult hy using conventional MRI,DWI and measurement of ADC values of solid components might be helpful for further evaluation.
出处 《放射学实践》 2012年第11期1225-1227,共3页 Radiologic Practice
基金 上海市科委基金(10411966000) 上海市卫生局基金(2008184)
关键词 卵巢 卵巢上皮源性肿瘤 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 Ovary Ovarian surface-epithelial tumors Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Bazot M. Nassar Slaba J, Thomassin Nag gara I, et aI. MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for diagnosis f adnexal tumors correlation wilh final histology[J]. Eur Radiol.2006, 16(12) ,2687-2699. 被引量:1
  • 2Sohaib SAA,Sahdev A,Trappen PV,et al. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging[J]. AJR,2003 180(5): 1297 130,1. 被引量:1
  • 3Sutton CL, MeKinney CD.jones JE.el al. ()varian masses revisited: radiologic and pathologic correlation[J]. RadioGraphics, 1992.12(5) : 853-877. 被引量:1
  • 4Bazot M, Darai E, Nassar-Slaba J, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis o[ ovarian tumors a review [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2008, 32 (5) :712-723. 被引量:1
  • 5Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate anal- ysis[J]. Radiology,2000,214 (1) :39-46. 被引量:1
  • 6Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Evaluation of cystk- ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient from turbo FLASH MR images[J]. Br J Radiol, 19!)8,71(846) :612-620. 被引量:1
  • 7Kim KA,Park CM,Lee JH.et al. Benign ovarian tumors with sol- id and cystic components that mimic mallgnancy[J]. AJR, 200,t, 182(5) : 1259-1265. 被引量:1
  • 8Umemoto M.Shiota M, Shimono T, et aL Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, focusing on the solid area based on diagnostic imaging[J] J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2006 32(4) : 195-201. 被引量:1
  • 9Erturk SM.Ichiktwa T,Smo K,et al. Diffusion-weighted magnet ic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses:ira pact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value[J]. J Comput As sist Tomogr. 2008, a2 ( 6 ) : 865-871. 被引量:1
  • 10Thomassin Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, el al. Contribution of ctiffusion-weighled MR in:aging for predicting benignity of com- plex adnexal rnasses[J]. Eur Radiol,2009,19(6) :1544-1552. 被引量:1

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部