期刊文献+

心房颤动射频消融术后无症状性心包积液的危险因素分析 被引量:2

Risk factors of asymptomatic pericardial effusion after radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨心房颤动(房颤)射频消融术后出现无症状性心包积液的危险因素。方法:选择首次接受房颤射频消融治疗的患者166例,术中根据房颤类型、肺静脉隔离情况,实施环肺静脉电隔离或肺静脉电隔离+左房消融径线的消融术式。术前及术后24 h常规行经胸心脏彩超检查,术后筛选出少量心包积液且无症状的患者,将心包积液与各危险因素进行统计分析。结果:房颤射频消融术后出现无症状性心包积液31例(心包积液组),无心包积液135例(非心包积液组)。心包积液组中阵发性房颤、非阵发性房颤分别为13例、18例,非心包积液组中分别为101例、34例(P=0.001)。心包积液组手术时间为(183.06±78.07)min,非心包积液组为(149.11±51.29)min,差异有统计学意义(P=0.005)。心包积液组术中电复律19例,非心包积液组37例(P=0.001)。消融术式:心包积液组中肺静脉电隔离术、肺静脉电隔离术+左房消融径线分别为6例、25例,非心包积液组中分别为61例、74例(P=0.003)。心包积液组的左房直径为(45.03±5.69)mm,非心包积液组为(41.41±6.59)mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.005)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,手术持续时间是房颤射频消融术后出现无症状性心包积液的独立危险因素[β=0.009,Exp(β)=1.009,Exp(β)的95%CI为:1.001~1.017,P=0.027]。结论:房颤射频消融手术持续时间长的患者中,术后易出现无症状性心包积液。 Objective:To investigate the risk factors of asymptomatic pericardial effusion(APE) after ablation in atrial fibrillation.Method:One hundred and sixty-six patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins or pulmonary veins plus additional lines of left atrium.Conventional transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients on the day before and 24 h after ablation.Risk factors were analyzed.Result:APE was found in 31 patients(APE group) and non-pericardial effusion was found in the other 135 patients(NPE group).There was 13 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 18 non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in APE group,while 101 and 34 in NPE group(P=0.001).Duration of procedure was(183.06±78.07)min in the APE group and(149.11±51.29)min in the NPE group(P=0.005).Cardioversion was done in 19 patients in APE group and 37 patients in NPE group(P=0.001).Ablation of pulmonary veins was 6 and ablation of pulmonary veins plus additional left atrium was 25 in APE group,while 61 and 74 in NPE group(P=0.003).Diameter of left atrium was(45.03±5.69) mm in APE group and(41.41±6.59) mm in NPE group(P=0.005).Logistic regression analysis showed that the duration of procedure was the independent risk factor of APE after ablation [β=0.009,Exp(β)=1.009,95%CI of Exp(β): 1.001-1.017,P=0.027].Conclusion:Duration of ablation procedure is the independent risk factor of APE after the ablation in atrial fibrillation.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期824-827,共4页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 心房颤动 射频消融 心包积液 危险因素 atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation asymptomatic pericardial effusion risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1CAPPATO R, CALKINS H, CHEN S A, et al. World- wide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of cath- eter ablation for human atrial fibrillation[J]. Circulation, 2005, Iii : 1100- 1105. 被引量:1
  • 2黄从新,马长生,张澍,曹克将,黄德嘉,吴书林,江洪,马坚,刘少稳,杨延宗,杨新春,张奎俊,李莉,刘旭,丁燕生,商丽华,王方正,陈新.经导管消融心房颤动中国专家共识[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2008,12(4):248-258. 被引量:61
  • 3董建增,刘兴鹏,马长生.心房颤动的导管消融[J].临床心血管病杂志,2010,26(9):641-643. 被引量:6
  • 4黄从新,张澍,马长生,杨延宗,黄德嘉,曹克将,江洪,杨新春,吴书林,商丽华,张奎俊,李莉,丁燕生,马坚,王祖禄,刘少稳,刘旭,董建增,姚焰,陈柯萍,陈明龙,王方正,陈新.心房颤动:目前的认识和治疗建议-2010[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2010,14(5):328-369. 被引量:93
  • 5杜以梅,张家明,于世龙.RAS抑制剂预防心房颤动研究进展[J].临床心血管病杂志,2011,27(3):161-162. 被引量:10
  • 6MAISCH B, SEFEROVIC P M, RISTIC A D, eta|. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of peri- cardial diseases executive summary[J]. Eur Heart J, 2004,25:587-610. 被引量:1
  • 7BERTAGLIA E, ZOPPO F, TONDO C, et al. Early complications of pulmonary vein catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a multicenter prospective registry on procedural safety[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2007,4 : 1265 - 1271. 被引量:1
  • 8HAER B A, MAURER A, STICHERLING C, et al. Routine eehocardiography after radiofrequency abla- tion to flog a dead horse? [J]. Europace,2009,11 155-157. 被引量:1
  • 9CHIERCHIA G B, CAPULZINI L, DROOGMANS S, et al. Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation abla- tion: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofre- quency pulmonary vein isolation[J]. Europaee,2010, 12:337-341. 被引量:1
  • 10陈松文,刘少稳,林佳雄,聂振宁,齐保振,陶惠伟,吴鸿谊,程宽,葛均波.心房颤动射频消融术后心包积液的处理及危险因素分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2008,36(9):801-806. 被引量:9

二级参考文献74

共引文献168

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部