期刊文献+

从社会福利最大化视角确定EPR管制标准 被引量:2

Determination of the EPR Regulation Standards from the Perspective of Social Welfare Maximization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建了包括生产者和消费者在内的产品生命周期模型.基于社会福利最大化的视角,在一个统一的模型中探讨了最优循环性管制标准和减量化管制标准的确定问题,以及影响最优管制标准的主要因素.研究表明,要素投入的边际产品价值等于其净价格是实现社会福利最大化的条件;而回收再利用成本、要素的边际贡献、物质投入的价格、废弃物的处置费用是影响最优管制标准的重要因素.因此,政策制定者在制定EPR管制标准时,不能片面追求环境绩效还应兼顾经济绩效,以实现社会福利最大化. From the perspective of social welfare maximization, a product life cycle model involving both producers and consumers was built in which the regulation standards for both recycling and reducing were determined, and the major factors affecting the optimal standards were discussed. The results showed that the socially optimal condition is reached when the value of each marginal product equals its net price, and the recycling cost, input' s marginal contribution, price of material input, cost of waste disposal are the most important factors for the optimal standards. Therefore, in order to maximize the social welfare, policy makers should take both environmental and economic performances into account while making EPR (extended producer responsibility) regulation policies.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期1669-1672,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71103030 71173034) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJC790222) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N100406002)
关键词 生产者责任延伸 管制政策 固体废弃物 管制标准 社会福利最大化 extended producer responsibility (EPR) regulation policy solid waste regulationstandard social welfare maximization
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Castel A, Clift R, Francae C. Extended producer responsibility policy in the European union a horse or a camel? [J ]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2004,8 ( 1/ 2):4 7. 被引量:1
  • 2Lindbqvist T, Lifset R. Can we take the concept of individual producer responsibility from theory to practice? [J] Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2003,7(2) :3 6. 被引量:1
  • 3Li L, Geiser K. Environmentally responsible public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated product policy (IPP)[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005,13(7):705 715. 被引量:1
  • 4McCracken J, Bell V. Complying with extended producer responsibility requirements: business impacts, tools and strategies[C]//IEEE International Symposiom on Electronics and the Environics and the Environment. Jamestown, 2004 : 199 - 203. 被引量:1
  • 5田海峰,孙广生,李凯.生产者责任延伸、废物再利用与政策工具选择——基于产品生命周期的一个考察[J].产业经济评论(山东),2010(3):22-36. 被引量:5
  • 6Sachs N. PLanning the funeral at the birth: extended producer responsibility in the European union and the united states[J ]. Harward EnvironTental Law Review, 2006,30 (51):51 -98. 被引量:1
  • 7Walls M, Karen P. Upstream pollution, downstream waste disposal, and the design of comprehensive environmental policies[ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2001,41(1):94 108. 被引量:1
  • 8Fullerton D, Wu W. Policies for green design[ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1998,36 (2):131 148. 被引量:1
  • 9孙广生,田海峰.面向供应链的环境治理组织模式研究——基于交易费用视角的考察[J].中国工业经济,2006(11):60-67. 被引量:18
  • 10Palmer K, Walls M. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies, and standards [J ]. Journal qf" Public Economic, 1997,65(2) :193 205. 被引量:1

二级参考文献28

共引文献20

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部