期刊文献+

麻醉手术风险评估与麻醉分级 被引量:43

Risk assessment and anesthesia classification in anesthesia and operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 围术期患者安全是麻醉和外科最重要的问题,也是影响外科治疗的关键因素。对患者做好准确而全面的术前评估和风险预测是做好术前准备、选择合适的麻醉和手术方式、做好对围术期并发症或特殊情况预防和处理的必要前提,也是降低围术期病死率、提高麻醉手术安全性的关键措施。本文对国内外术前评估和风险预测标准及应用进行了综合评述,并对一项新的麻醉分级标准进行探讨。 The safety of patient is the most important matter in anesthesia and operation.It is also a key factor to affect surgical treatment.The pre-operative evaluation and risk prediction are necessary preparations for surgery.To reduce the fatality rate in per-operative period and the anesthesia safety,it is necessary to choose appropriate anesthesia and surgery procedures and to well prepare for prevention of complications.In this paper,a new anesthesia classification is described.The standards of the pre-operative assessment and risk prediction are reviewed.
作者 蔡宏伟 曹娟
出处 《国际病理科学与临床杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期443-446,共4页 Journal of International Pathology and Clinical Medicine
关键词 围术期 风险评估 麻醉 手术 麻醉分级 peri-operation risk assessment anesthesia operation anesthesia classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献27

  • 1吴鹏,孙翼,孙竞,李晓强.纤维蛋白原和D-二聚体在急性胰腺炎分型中的早期预测价值[J].郧阳医学院学报,2011,30(1):32-34. 被引量:7
  • 2陈兵,张璐.危重病患者血乳酸水平与APACHEⅡ评分相关性研究[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(1):63-63. 被引量:35
  • 3Armbruster C, Kriwanek S, Roka R. Spontaneous perforation of the large intestine. Resection with primary anastomosis or staged (Hartmann) procedure?[J]. Chirurg, 2001,72(8):910-913. 被引量:1
  • 4Bielecki K, Kaminski P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: morbidity and mortality [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2002,6(3): 177-182. 被引量:1
  • 5Biondo S, Pares D, Marti Rague J, et al. Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon [J]. Am J Surg,2002,183(3):256-260. 被引量:1
  • 6Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, et al. Presentation, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for obstructive and perforative colorectal carcinoma [J]. Am J Surg,2005,190(3):376-382. 被引量:1
  • 7Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation:a physiologically based classification system[J]. Crit Care Med, 1981,9(8):591-597. 被引量:1
  • 8Ochiai T, Hiranuma S, Takiguchi N, et al. SOFA score predicts postoperative outcome of patients with colorectal perforation[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2004,51 (58): 1007- 1010. 被引量:1
  • 9Oda S, Hirasawa H, Sugai T, et al. Comparison of Sepsisrelated Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and CIS (cellular injury score) for scoring of severity for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)[J]. Intensive Care Med,2000,26(12):1786-1793. 被引量:1
  • 10Komatsu S, Shimomatsuya T, Nakajima M, et al. Severity scoring systems for prognosis and efficacy of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber treatment for colonic perforation [J]. Surg Today, 2006,36(9):807-810. 被引量:1

共引文献112

同被引文献387

引证文献43

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部