摘要
目的对比显微外科输精管再通术与常规输精管再通术疗效,评价2种手术方式的妊娠率和术后并发症情况。方法回顾性分析我院1988年至2010年55例(对照组)常规输精管再通术和2005年至2010年39例(观察组)显微外科输精管再通术的临床及随访资料。结果在18个月随访期内,显示对照组30例受孕,妊娠率54.5%,观察组34例受孕,妊娠率87.2%,2组数据比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论显微外科输精管再通术较常规输精管再通术可有效提高妊娠率。
objective To compare the efficacy of micro-vasovasostomy and traditional vasovasostomy and evaluate the pregnancy rate and complications. Methods The clinical data of 39 cases patients underwent microsurgery （ observation group） and 55 cases with tradition- al treatment （control group） were analyzed retrospectively. Results After being followed up for 18 months, there were 30 cases of pregnancy （54.5%） in control group and 34 cases of pregnancy in observation group （87.2%）. It showed a signifacantly difference between the two groups. Conclusion The micro-vasovasostomy is a feasible method with low complication to increase pregnancy rate.
出处
《局解手术学杂志》
2012年第6期655-656,共2页
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
