摘要
以CSSCI数据库中1998-2007年度的引文数据为基础,计算出我国综合性社科类学术期刊的h指数、g指数、不同时间跨度的影响因子。对期刊g指数进行深入分析,发现g指数能够一定程度上区分期刊的学术水平高低,但对于g指数相同的期刊,则需要与其它期刊评价指标进行优势互补;对累积影响因子进行分析,发现综合性社科期刊比较活跃,变动较快;对h指数、g指数和累积影响因子进行对比发现,g指数优化了h指数评价指标,但不能取代h指数指标,h指数和g指数在期刊评价方面一致性较强,累积影响因子与h指数、g指数在期刊评价方面存在相对较明显的差异性。通过相关性分析,发现综合性社科期刊h指数、g指数和累积影响因子的关系十分密切,相关系数也很大。
The h-index, g-index and cumulative impact factor of comprehensive social science journals are calculated by CSSCI over the period 1998-2007 in this paper. Through the analysis of g-index, we found that g-index can distinguish the academic level of the journal to a certain extent. With the same g-index, it needs other evaluation index to be a supplement. On the cumulative impact factor analysis, it is considered that comprehensive social science journals are active. The comparison among h-index, g-index and cumulative impact factor, shows that g-index optimizes h-index evaluation, but it cannot replace h-index, h-index and g-index has a much stronger consistency in journal evaluation than cumulative impact factor. Finally, SPSS is utilized to analyze the relativity among h-index, g-index and cumulative impact factor. The conclusion is that strong correlation is explored.
出处
《情报科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期1645-1651,共7页
Information Science
关键词
H指数
G指数
影响因子
期刊评价
h-index
g-index
impact factor
journal evaluation
