摘要
在先权利是一个开放的抽象概念。由于对在先权利的对象所包含的信誉与影响力的搭便车行为违反了商标法所追求的维护公平正当的市场竞争秩序的宗旨,也造成商标权人不当得利,各国法律均保护在先权利。但就我国商标法的在先权利条款而言,其内容构成的不同理解思路产生了不同的在先权利保护效力。我国司法实践将知识产权法与民法通则所明确规定的权利以及合法利益都归为在先权利,均能够适用商标法规范直接撤销在后的商标注册,从保护体系协调看,这一定位是符合公平原则的。
Prior rights is an open abstraction. Protection of prior rights is pursued by the basic norms of the national laws. Its basis is that the free-rider behavior on the credibility and influence of object contained in prior rights is in violation of trademark law which aims at pursuing the maintaining of fair and legitimate market competition order, and also results in unjust enrichment of the trademark owner. However, as to the prior rights provisions in the Trademark Law of China, the different understanding of its contents produces different protection effectiveness. China＇s judicial practice considers stipulated in intellectual property laws and the General Principles of the Civil Law as the property prior rights ,and could apply trademark law norms to directly revoke the later registered trademark .Perceiving from the protection system coordination, this is in line with the principle of fairness.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第10期24-30,共7页
Intellectual Property
