摘要
鸦片战争前夕,中英两国因制度、文化、观念等差异,导致在处理共同问题时交流不畅,双方的"对话"成了各自的"独白"。在国际体系上,中国的朝贡体系是一种尊卑有序的观念,英国所处的维也纳体系是一种平等原则。在国家类型上,中国是王朝统治,英国是民族国家。在治理模式上,中国注重人治,英国注重法治。在价值观念上,中国偏好集体主义,英国喜欢个人主义。在这种情况下,对话失败了,解决问题的最终方式走向了使用武力。
On the eve of the Opium War, the negotiations addressing the common problems between China and the UK were not unblocked. They had different institutions, cultures and concepts, and their dialogues were monologic. Chinese Tribute System reflected the concepts of superiority and inferiority in the foreign relations, while Britain within Vienna System had the principle of equality. China was a dynastic country, while Britain was a democratic state. China was ruled by man while Britain ruled by law. China preferred to collectivism, and Britain liked individualism and liberalism better. They could not be clearly known each other. In this context, the dialogues were failed. Then the final solution must be the use of military power.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第3期174-178,共5页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
中英关系
交涉
观念差异
Sino-the UK relations
the Opium War
dialogues
conceptual difference
