期刊文献+

急诊患者连续性肾脏替代治疗的预后因素分析 被引量:1

Prognostic analysis of patients receiving emergency continuous renal replacement therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:了解急诊患者连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的预后评价及死亡风险的预测因素。方法:回顾分析我院急诊监护室2005-05-2011-07接受CRRT治疗的217例患者。结果:217例急诊患者,中位年龄68(50~77)岁,应用Logistic回归分析影响死亡的危险因素,由大到小依次是呼吸机(P<0.001),APACHEⅡ评分(P<0.001),年龄(P=0.001)。应用ROC曲线计算APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分和乳酸的曲线下面积(AUC),分别为0.780(P<0.001)、0.723(P<0.001)、0.725(P<0.001)。结论:APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分和乳酸可用于CRRT患者死亡风险的预测,指导临床治疗。机械通气、APACHEⅡ评分和年龄与患者的死亡具有密切联系。 Objective: To evaluate the prognosis and the risk factors for death of emergency patients receiving the treatment of CRRT. Method:The data of 217 patients in the emergency department (ED) of a comprehensive teaching hospital receiving emergency CRRT were studied. Result: The median age of the two hundred and seven- teen patients was 68 (50, 77) years old. Logistic regression analysis showed that mechanical ventilation (P〈0. 001), APACHE Ⅱ score (P〈0. 001) and age (P=0. 001) were the risk factors affecting the prognosis of CRRT patients. Areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were bigger than 0. 7 in A PACHE Ⅱ score, SOFA score and lactic acid. Conclusion:APACHE Ⅱ score, SOFA score and lactic acid can be applied to predict death of CRRT patients. Mechanical ventilation, APACHE Ⅱ score and age were the risk fac- tors affecting the prognosis of CRRT patients.
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期332-334,共3页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 连续性肾脏替代治疗 乳酸 APACHEⅡ评分 SOFA评分 CRRT lactic acid APACHE Ⅱ SOFA
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1LEVY M,FINK M,MARSHALL J C,et al. 2001 SC CM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International sepsis definations conference[J]. Crit Care Med, 2003,31 : 1250-1256. 被引量:1
  • 2BELLOMO R, RONCO C, KELLUM J A, et al. Acute renal failure-definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative(ADQI) Group[J]. Crit Care, 2004,8 : R204 - R212. 被引量:1
  • 3VINCENT J L, MORENO R, TAKALA J, et al. The SOFA(sepsis related organ failure assessment)score to describe organ dysfunction failure [J]. Intensive Care Meal,1996,22:707-710. 被引量:1
  • 4CHEN Y C, HSU H H, FANG J T. APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in critically ill patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis [ J] Dial Transplant, 2002, 31:222-233. 被引量:1
  • 5KNAUS W A,DRAPER E A,WAGNER D P,et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system[J]. Crit Care Med, 1985,13:818-829. 被引量:1
  • 6VANHOLDER R. VAN BIESEN W, LAMEIRE N. What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients[J]? J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001,12:S40-43. 被引量:1
  • 7王长远,秦俭.乳酸和乳酸清除率在老年脓毒症患者预后评估中的应用[J].临床肺科杂志,2010,15(1):124-125. 被引量:39

二级参考文献11

共引文献38

同被引文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部