期刊文献+

胃癌手术方式对患者手术创伤程度的影响 被引量:12

Impact of surgical modalities for gastric cancer on operational trauma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估胃癌手术方式对手术创伤程度的影响。方法1994年8月至2011if-4月,中山大学胃肠胰外科施行病灶切除术的1499例胃癌患者,依手术方式分为根治性切除组(根治组,1344例),姑息性切除组(姑息组,155例),并根据胃切除方式、根治程度、联合脏器切除进一步划分亚组,以手术时间、术后住院日、术中输血量、并发症发生率作为手术创伤程度评估指标,比较各组、各亚组的手术创伤程度。结果根治组和姑息组的中位输血量(Q1,Q3)分别为0(0,600)比400(0,800)ml(P〈0.05);两组的手术时间、术后住院日、并发症差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。对远端胃切除病例,根治组和姑息组的中位输血量(Q1,Q3)分别为0(0,400)比400(200,800)ml(P〈0.05);两组的手术时间、术后住院日、并发症差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。对全胃切除病例,根治组、姑息组的手术时间、中位输血量、术后住院日、并发症差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。在根治组病例中,接受D1、D2、D3、腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫(PAND)患者的手术时间,术后住院日,中位输血量(Q1,Q3)差异均有统计学意义[(248±71)、(271±72)、(309±96)、(351±103)min,(13±4)、(16±12)、(18±11)、(20±19)d,0(0,500),0(0,600),400(0,800),600(200,1000)ml,均P〈0.05],而并发症差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。在根治组病例中,无、有联合脏器切除患者的手术时间、术后住院日、中位输血量分别为(264±66)比(315±96)min,(15±11)比(19±15)d,0(0,400)比400(0,800)ml,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),而并发症差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论较姑息性切除手术相比,根治性手术并不增加胃癌患者的手术创伤。对接受根治术� Objective To evaluate the impact of surgical modality for gastric cancer on operational trauma. Methods A total of 1499 cases of gastric cancer undergoing surgical procedures were divided into the groups of radical resection (RR, n = 1344) and palliative resection group( NRR,n = 155 ) according to their surgical modalities. And they were further divided into sub-groups according to the profiles of gastrectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy and multiorganic resection. The extent of operational trauma ( as evaluated by operative duration, transfusion volume, postoperative hospital day and incidence of complications) was compared in different groups and subgroups. Results In RR and NRR groups, median transfusion volume ( Q1, Q3 ) was 0 (0, 600) vs 400 (0, 800) ml respectively. There was significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). No significant difference existed in operative duration, postoperative hospital day or incidence of complications between two groups ( all P 〉 0. 05 ). In cases of distal gastrectomy, median transfusion volume was 0 ( 0, 400 ) vs 400 ( 200, 800) ml in RR and NRR groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ). No significant difference existed in operative duration, postoperative hospital day or incidence of complications between two groups ( all P 〉 0.05 ). In cases of total gastrectomy, no significant difference existed in operative duration, postoperative hospital day, median transfusion volume or incidence of complications between two groups ( all P 〉 0. 05). In RR group, for the cases treated by D1, D2, D3 and paraaortic lymph node dissection (PAND), there were significant differences in operative duration( (248 ±71 ), (271 ±72),(309±96) , (351 ± 103) min), postoperative hospital day( ( 13 ±4), ( 16 ± 12) , ( 18 ±11 ) , (20 ± 19) days), median transfusion volume(0(0, 500), 0(0, 600), 400(0, 800) , 600(200, 1000) ml) ( all P 〈 0. 05 ). But no significant difference existed in incidence
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第38期2694-2698,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃肿瘤 创伤和损伤 手术方式 Stomach neoplasms Wounds and injuries Surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancertreatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer, 2011,14:113-123. 被引量:1
  • 2Sasako M. Gastric cancer eastern experience. Surg Oncol Clin NAm,2012, 21:71-77. 被引量:1
  • 3Mita K, Ito H, Fukumoto M,et al. Surgical outcomes andsurvival after extended multiorgan resection for T4 gastric cancer.Am J Surg, 2012,203: 107-111. 被引量:1
  • 4Deng J, Liang H, Sun D, et al. Extended lymphadenectomyimprovement of overall survival of gastric cancer patients withperigastric node metastasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011,396:615-623. 被引量:1
  • 5Songun I,Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment ofgastric cancer : 15-year follow-up results of the randomisednationwide Dutch Dl D2 trial. Lancet Oncol,2010,11 :439-449. 被引量:1
  • 6Butte JM, Kerrigan N, Waugh E,et al. Complications andmortality of extended gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Rev MedChil, 2010,138:1487-1494. 被引量:1
  • 7Fukagawa T. Standard strategy for lymph node dissection inadvanced gastric cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi,2012,113:4-7. 被引量:1
  • 8Ikeguchi M, Saito H, Tatebe S, et al. Outcome of treatment ofliver metastasis after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Am Surg,2011,77:1274-1276. 被引量:1
  • 9Roh H, Kyung S, Lee H, et al. outcome of hepatic resection formetastatic gastric cancer. Am Surg, 2005,71:95-99. 被引量:1
  • 10Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, et al. Survival benefits fromsplenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastriccancer patients : relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups ofpatients. Gastric Cancer, 2011,14 : 172-177. 被引量:1

同被引文献98

  • 1张永潮,金大庆,李卫民,孙庆跃.利用经口隧道技术切除2.5cm以上病变的可行性研究[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(12):75-77. 被引量:1
  • 2乔文辉,杨磊,李斌.不同术式对老年胃癌患者术后创伤及预后的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):23-25. 被引量:19
  • 3Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer, 2011,14:113-123. 被引量:1
  • 4Kim SY, SungJK, Moon HS, et al. Is endoscopic mucosal resection a sufficient treatment for low-grade gastric epithelial dysplasia? Gut Liver, 2012, 6:446451. 被引量:1
  • 5Jung HY. Endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: current status in Korea. Dig Endosc, 2012, 24 Suppll :159-165. 被引量:1
  • 6Shimoyama S, Seto Y, Yasuda H, et al. Concepts, rationale, and current outcomes of less invasive surgical strategies for early gastric cancer: data from a quarter-century of experience in a single institution. WorldJ Surg, 2005, 29: 58 -65. 被引量:1
  • 7Holscher AH, Drebber U, Monig SP, et al. Early gastric cancer: lymph node metastasis starts with deep mucosal infiltration. Ann Surg, 2009, 250:791-797. 被引量:1
  • 8Tsuzuki T, Okada H, Kawahara Y, et al. UsefuJness and problems of endoscopic ultrasonography in prediction of the depth of tumor invasion in early gastric cancer. Acta Med Okayama, 2011, 65: 105-112. 被引量:1
  • 9Shen Y, Kang HK,Jeong YY, et al. Evaluation of early gastric cancer at multidetector CT with multiplanar reformation and virtual endoscopy. Radiographics, 2011, 31 : 189 -199 . 被引量:1
  • 10Edwards P, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG, et al. Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma. BrJ Cancer, 2004, 90: 1888-1892. 被引量:1

引证文献12

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部