期刊文献+

毒气泄漏事故避难场所避难效果分析 被引量:1

Effect analysis of shelter for toxic gas release incident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有毒气体泄漏时,疏散和就地避难都是保护人员安全的有效行动。当疏散行动无效时,此时可考虑进行就地避难,应急决策者必须准确认识就地避难的可靠性。文中模拟分析了渗透吸附作用、换气次数、避难室空间体积、有效吸附面积对避难室内浓度的影响。结果表明,渗透吸附作用的存在明显降低了室内浓度,且强度越大浓度越低;换气次数越小,浓度越低;避难室空间越大,浓度越低,但影响不明显;吸附面积与空间体积之比越大,浓度下降越明显;毒负荷指数越大,规定暴露时间内避难室内毒负荷上升越缓慢。最后确定了特定场景下避难室最佳换气次数。 Evacuation and shelter-in-place has usually been used to protect public from toxic gas release incidents.When evacuation is noneffective,shelter-in-place should be considered.So emergency decision-makers should have an accurate understanding on the reliability of shelter-in-place.Effects of sink adsorption,air exchange rate,saferoom volume and effective adsorption area on safe-room concentration were studied in this paper.It showed that the existence of adsorption significantly reduced the indoor concentration,and the greater the intensity was,the lower concentration was;the smaller the air exchange rate was,the lower concentration was;the larger the safe-room volume was,the lower concentration was,but the effect was not obvious;the larger the absorption area and space volume ratio were,the concentration declined more obvious;the greater the toxic load index was,the lower toxic load increased in shelter-in-place in stated exposure time.Finally,the optimal air exchange rate was determined in a specific scenario.This study will be helpful for guiding the selection and design of emergency shelters.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 2012年第9期95-100,共6页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 “十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2006BAK01B03-3) 江苏省“青蓝工程”中青年学术带头人资助项目 南京工业大学学科基金项目
关键词 就地避难 泄漏事故 避难室 吸附作用 毒负荷 shelter-in-place release incident safe-room absorption toxic load
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1肖国清,温丽敏,陈宝智,王浩.毒气泄漏时的最佳疏散路径[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2001,22(6):674-677. 被引量:27
  • 2袁媛,汪定伟.灾害扩散实时影响下的应急疏散路径选择模型[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(6):1563-1566. 被引量:56
  • 3温丽敏,陈宝智.重大事故人员应急疏散模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报,1999,9(6):69-73. 被引量:37
  • 4T.S. Glickman, A. M. Ujhara, Deciding between in place protection and evacuation in toxic vapor cloud emer- gencies [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1990, (23) : 57-72. 被引量:1
  • 5Sorensen J H, Shumpert B L, Vogt B M. Planning for protective action decision making: evacuate or shelter-in- place [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2004, (A109) :I-11. 被引量:1
  • 6Jordi Casal, Eulalia Planas-Cuchi, Joaquim Casal. Shel-ter as a protective measure against airborne virus spread [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, ( A68 ) : 179-189. 被引量:1
  • 7W.R. Chan, W.W. Nazaroff, P.N. Price, A.J. Gadg- il. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place-- | : Idealized conditions [ J ]. Atmospheric. Environment, 2007, (41) : 4962-4976. 被引量:1
  • 8W.R. Chan, W.W. Nazaroff, P.N. Price, A.J. Gadg- il. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place--I1 : Residen- tial districts [ J ]. Atmospheric. Environment, 2007, (41) : 7082-7095. 被引量:1
  • 9W.R. Chan, W.W. Nazaroff, P.N. Price, A.J. Gadg- il. Effectiveness of urban shelter-in-place--HI : Commer- cial districts [ J]. Building simulation, 2008, ( 1 ) : 144- 157. 被引量:1
  • 10J.J. Jetter, C. Whitfield. Effectiveness of expedient sheltering in place in a residence [ J ]. Journal of Haz- ardous Materials, 2005, (All9) :31-40. 被引量:1

二级参考文献20

共引文献110

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部