摘要
目的探讨外固定支架和交锁髓内钉治疗胫腓骨骨折疗效情况。方法分析我院收治的胫腓骨骨折患者临床资料,依据治疗方式不同分为外固定支架组30例和交锁髓内钉组30例。观察两组患者临床疗效情况,进行对比分析。结果外固定支架组优良率80%,交锁髓内钉组优良率为100%,交锁髓内钉组治疗胫腓骨骨折临床治疗优良率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论交锁髓内钉对于胫腓骨骨折处血液供应和生物力学的环境干扰相对较小,利于骨折端的愈合,预后良好,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the external fixator and intramedullary interlocking nail tibia and fibula fractures. Methods analysis in our hospital of the tibia and fibula fractures in patients with clinical data, according to the treatment is di- vided into 30 cases of the external fixator group of 30 cases and interlocking intramedullary nail group. Observe the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients were analyzed. Results The external fixation group in the results of excellent rate of 80% , 100% ex- cellent and good rate of interlocking intramedullary nail group, tibia and fibula fracture of the interlocking intramedullary nail group good clinical treatment rate was significantly higher（ P 〈 0.05 ）difference was statistically significance. Conclusion Interlocking intramedullary nail for the tibia and fibula fracture blood supply and biomechanical environment interference is relatively small, and conducive to fracture healing, the prognosis is good, worthy of clinical application.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2012年第9期1624-1625,共2页
Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词
外固定支架
交锁髓内钉
胫腓骨骨折
outside fixed bracket
interlocking intramedullary nail
tibia and fibula fracture
