摘要
目的：探讨心血管疾病APACHEⅡ、SAPSⅡ分级和APACHEⅣ对病情的评估有无差异。方法：回顾性分析2006年1月—2011年10月宜兴市第一人民医院重症监护室收治的200名资料完整的心血管疾病患者。记录资料包括入院24h的APACHEⅡ、24h的APACHEⅣ评分和SAPSⅡ评分。用卡方检验方法分析3种评分方法之间的差异性。结果：APACHEⅡ、APAcHEⅣ评分和SAPSⅡ评分系统对心血管疾病的严重程度评估相互之间存在差异。结论：结合3种临床评分系统，对心血管疾病进行准确的评估，及时把握病情严重程度，有效的指导临床治疗。
Objective： To study cardiovascular disease APACHEII, SAPS Hand APACHE IV grade to the condition assessment of no difference. Methods ： a retrospective analysis of 2006 January to 2011 October Yixing city first people＇s Hospital ICU were 200 data integrity in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The record information comprises admission 24h APACHE11, 24h APACHE IV score and SAPS II score. Using the chi - square test method analysis of 3 scoring methods and the difference between. Resuits： APACHEll, APACHE IVscore and SAPS II score system for cardiovascular disease severity assessment of differences between each other. Conclusion ： the combination of 3 clinical scoring system, for cardiovascular disease are accurate assessment, timely grasp the severity of the disease, effectively guide the clinical treatment.
出处
《成都医学院学报》
CAS
2012年第02Z期244-244,共1页
Journal of Chengdu Medical College
