期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床对比研究 被引量:11

Clinical Comparative Study of Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的临床效果。方法:整理分析我院2010年8月至2012年3月收治的285例阑尾炎患者,其中148例采用开腹阑尾切除术(OA组),137例采用经腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA组),比较分析两组的临床效果。结果:LA组在术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛、住院时间及切口感染等方面均优于OA组,(P<0.05);LA组手术时间略高于OA组,但无统计学意义(P>0.05);LA组住院费用明显高于OA组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)费用较高,在经济条件允许的情况下治疗阑尾炎,具有创伤小,疼痛轻,恢复快,感染率低等优点,值得推广。 Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of open appendectomy(OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy(LA).Methods:From August 2010 to May 2012 in our hospital,285 cases with appendicitis accepted appendectomy,148 patients were treated with open appendectomy(OA),137 patients were treated with laparoscopic appendectomy(LA).the clinical efficacy of two groups were compared.Results:The operation time,the time of passing flatus after operation and hospitalization time of LA group were significantly shorter,the LA group’s intraoperative blood loss,the pain after operation and the wound infection rate was obviously less,there were statistical significance than those of OA group(all P〈0.05).The operation time of LA group was slightly longer than that of OA group,the difference was not statically significant between two groups(P〉0.05).The cost of LA group were significant higher than that of OA group(P〈0.05) Conclusion:Laparoscopic appendectomy is an effective method for appendicitis with little trauma,quicker recovery,shorter hospital stay,and more comfortable.it is worthy of concern.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2012年第9期1488-1489,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 阑尾炎 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 阑尾切除术 微创手术 Appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Open appendectomy; Minimally invasive surgery;
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et aI.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg,2004;239:43-52. 被引量:1
  • 2Mc Burney C,The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating.Ann Surg, 1894;20:38-43. 被引量:1
  • 3Semmk.Endoscopic appendectomy [J ]. Endoscopy, 1983; 15(2):59-64. 被引量:1
  • 4Long K H,Bannon M P, Zietlow S Eet aI.A Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses[J].Surgery,2001 ; 129(4): 390--400. 被引量:1
  • 5lgnac IO R C,Burke R,Spenger D,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Result of a prospective randomized double- blinded trial [J].Surg Endosc,2004;18 (2) : 334-337. 被引量:1
  • 6Katkhouda A N,mason R J,Towfigh S,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double -blind study[J]. Ann Aurg, 2005;242(3): 439-450. 被引量:1
  • 7Lasson P G, Henr lksson G, Olsson M,et al.Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women A randomized study[J].Surg Endosc, 2001; 15( 2): 200-202. 被引量:1
  • 8Pirro N, Berdah SV. Appendicitis: yes or no to laparoscopic approach? Chir (Paris),2006 May-Jun; 143(3): 155-159. 被引量:1
  • 9Agresta, Ferdinando, De Simone,et al. Laparoscop ic Appendectomy in Italy: An Appraisal of 26, 863 C ases[J]. L aparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techn iques, 2004;14:1. 被引量:1
  • 10邹声泉主编..实用腔镜外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:828.

二级参考文献10

  • 1王天龙,于德水.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的监测与麻醉[J].普外临床,1995,10(5):264-266. 被引量:4
  • 2FRITTS L,ORLANDO R.Laparoscopic appendectomy.A safety and cost analysis[J].Arch Surg,1993,128:521. 被引量:1
  • 3NOWZARADAN Y,WESTMORELAND J,MCCARVER C T,et al.Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis:indication and currentuse[J].J Laparoendosc Surg,1991,1:247. 被引量:1
  • 4SEMM K.Appendectomy.In:Macfadyen BV,ponsky J,eds Operative laparoscopy and thoracoscopy[M].philadephia:Lippin-cott Raven,1996:738-755. 被引量:1
  • 5LONG K H,BANNON M P,ZIETLOW S P,et al.A Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy:clinical and economic analyses[J].Surgery,2001,129(4):390-400. 被引量:1
  • 6LASSON P G,HENRIKSSON G,OLSSON M,et al.Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women A randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2001,15(2):200-202. 被引量:1
  • 7IGNACIO R C,BURKE R,SPENCER D,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:what is the real difference? Result of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18(2):334-337. 被引量:1
  • 8KATKHOUDA N,MASON R J,TOWFIGH S,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:a prospective randomized double-blind study[J].Ann Aurg,2005,242(3):439-450. 被引量:1
  • 9ORTEGA A,HUNTER J H,PETER J,et al.A prospective,randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy[J].Am J Surg,1995,69(2):208-213. 被引量:1
  • 10KATKHOUDA N,MASON R J,TOWFIGH S,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:a prospective randomized double-blind study[J].Ann Surg,2005,242(3):439-450. 被引量:1

共引文献18

同被引文献62

引证文献11

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部