期刊文献+

超声造影评价急性胰腺炎严重度的初步研究 被引量:7

Preliminary study on assessing the seversity of acute pancreatitis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较超声造影与增强螺旋CT评价急性胰腺炎严重度的准确性,探讨超声造影评价急性胰腺炎严重度的结果与临床指标的关系。方法 对33例72h内已行增强螺旋CT确诊的急性胰腺炎住院患者进行低机械指数实时超声造影(机械指数MI0.19),分别对增强螺旋CT及超声造影结果进行Balthazar’s分级,同时计算严重度指数(USSI,CTSI),比较分析二者与Ransons评分的相关性。结果 33例急性胰腺炎患者的USSI与CTSI及Ranson评分之间有一定的相关性(r=0.970,r=0.705;P<0.01)。结论 超声造影对急性胰腺炎的严重度评价有很好的作用,与临床参数评价有一定相关性,相对螺旋增强CT又具有简便、安全、禁忌症少等优点,可进行进一步研究。 Objective To compare diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography(CT) in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis, and to explore the correlation between nhrasound findings and clinical parameters. Methods Thirty-three patients with acute pancreatitis confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT within 72 were detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Bahhazar's grading system was used to measure CT and ultrasound severity indices (CTSI and USSI ). Correlations between CTSI and USSI and between USSI and clinical parameters (the Ranson score) were tested by Spearman' s rank correlation coefficient. Results A strong correlation was demonstrated between CTSI and USSI (r=0.970, P〈0.01 ). Ultrasound findings were correlated with the Ranson score (r =0.705, P〈0.01 ). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is effective and accurate in the assessment of acute pancreatitis severity. A significant correlation is observed between USSI and clinic parameters (Ranson score). The procedure is more convenient, safer and has fewer contraindieations than contrast-enhanced CT.
出处 《临床超声医学杂志》 2012年第9期589-592,共4页 Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
关键词 超声造影 急性胰腺炎 计算机断层扫描术 Contrast-enhanced uhrasound Acute pancreatitis Computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献50

  • 1严昆,戴莹,王艳滨,尹珊珊,霍苓,杨薇,张晖,吴薇,陈敏华.超声造影对胰腺占位病变的诊断应用价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(5):361-364. 被引量:52
  • 2吕明德,谢晓燕,徐辉雄,刘广健,徐作峰,郑艳玲,梁瑾瑜.肝局灶性病变超声造影:参照欧洲指南1015例临床报告[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(6):431-434. 被引量:69
  • 3曹战宇,孙家邦.造影剂对重症急性胰腺炎胰腺微循环的影响[J].首都医科大学学报,2007,28(3):395-398. 被引量:3
  • 4Nagase M, Furuse J, Ishii H, et al. Evaluation of contrast enhancement patterns in pancreatic tumors by coded harmonic sonographic imaging with a microbubble contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med,2003,22:789-795. 被引量:1
  • 5Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B, et al. Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. Am J Roentgenol, 1998,170 : 1315-1322. 被引量:1
  • 6Albrecht T,Blomley M, Bolondi L, et al. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med,2004,25:249-256. 被引量:1
  • 7Passamonti M, Vercelli A, Azzaretti A, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with a new ultrasound contrast agent using continuous low acoustic power imaging: comparison with contrast enhanced spiral CT. Radiol Med (Torino),2005,109:358-369. 被引量:1
  • 8Oshikawa O, Tanaka S, Ioka T, et al. Dynamic sonography of pancreatic tumors:comparison with dynamic CT. Am J Roentgenol, 2002,178: 1133-1137. 被引量:1
  • 9Sofuni A, Iijima H, Moriyasu F, et al. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors using ultrasound contrast imaging. J Gastroenterol, 2005,40 : 518-525. 被引量:1
  • 10Ozawa Y, Numata K, Tanaka K, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of small pancreatic mass lesions. J Ultrasound Med, 2002,21:983-991. 被引量:1

共引文献61

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部