期刊文献+

投资者情绪对股票横截面收益的非对称影响研究 被引量:15

The Asymmetric Relation between Investor Sentiment and Cross-section of Stock Returns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Fama-French三因子模型未解释部分包含大量市场非理性信息,本文以周和月好淡指数作为投资情绪的代理变量,对其进行假日、季节调整,并将其分为乐观和悲观、极端和非极端四类;依据市值、账面市值比、市值-账面市值比将上市公司分为35个组合;运用FF三因子模型,检验投资者情绪,特别是极端情绪(包括乐观和悲观)对股票横截面收益的影响。研究发现:周投资者情绪对股票横截面收益有正向影响;月投资者情绪仅对小市值股票横截面收益有负向影响;周极端乐观和极端悲观情绪对股票横截面收益影响具有非对称性;市场对极端悲观情绪反应过度,对极端乐观情绪反应不足。 The unexplained variance of cross-section of stock returns by Fama-French model contains information on in- vestor sentiment. Using week- and month-horizon HAODAN index as the proxy of investor sentiment and adjusting them by holiday and seasonal variation, the paper groups the sentiment into four types : optimistic, pessimistic, extreme, and non-extreme sentiment. By forming the size deeiles, BE/ME deci|es, and size-BE/ME 35 portfolios, this paper tests whether the effect of(extreme) investor sentiment on eross-section of stock returns is significant after controlling for Fama-French factors. The results find that: the week-horizon sentiment has positive effect on stock returns; the month- horizon sentiment has negative effect only on small size stock returns; most importantly, the week-horizon extreme senti- ment has asymmetric effect on stock returns-the stock market tends to overreact to extreme pessimistic sentiment and underreaet to extreme optimistic sentiment.
作者 陆江川 陈军
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期52-57,63,共7页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972101)
关键词 投资者情绪 好淡指数 股票横截面收益 非对称性 investor sentiment HAODAN index cross-section of stock returns asymmetriy
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Banz R W. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks [ J]. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, 1981, 9(1) : 3-18. 被引量:1
  • 2Fama E F, French K R. The cross-section of expected stock returns[Jl. The Journal of Finance, 1992, 47 (2) : 427-465. 被引量:1
  • 3Fama E F, French K R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56. 被引量:1
  • 4Fama E F, French K R. Muhifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies [ J ]. The Journal of Finance, 1996, 51 (1): 55- 84. 被引量:1
  • 5Kumar A, Lee C M C. Retail investor sentiment and return comovements[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (5) : 2451-2486. 被引量:1
  • 6Carhart M M. On persistence in mutual fund performance [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(1): 57-82. 被引量:1
  • 7Jegadeesh N, Titman S. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(1): 65-91. 被引量:1
  • 8Ang A, Hodrick R J, Xing Y, et al.. The cross-section of volatility and expected returns [ J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 ( 1 ) : 259-299. 被引量:1
  • 9Ang A, Hodrick R J, Xing Y, et al.. High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns:international and further U. S. evidence[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 91 ( 1 ) :1-23. 被引量:1
  • 10Bali T G, Cakici N, Whitelaw R F. Maxing out:Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 99 (2) : 427- 446. 被引量:1

二级参考文献14

共引文献108

同被引文献155

引证文献15

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部