摘要
目的比较套扎术与硬化剂注射术对肝硬化失代偿期引起食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者的疗效。方法对我院2008年7月至2011年7月以来,实施50例食管曲张静脉套扎术与50例食管胃底静脉曲张硬化剂注射术治疗,从止血率、死亡率、并发症及平均住院时间方面比较两者疗效。结果两者止血率、死亡率无统计学差异(P>0.05),但行硬化剂注射术后并发症及平均住院时间明显少于套扎术(P<0.05)。结论套扎术与硬化剂注射术两者都是安全、有效治疗及预防食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的有效方法,但硬化剂注射术术后并发症及平均住院时间低于套扎术。
Objective To compare band ligation （BL） with endoscopic sclerotherapy （SCL） in treatment of esophageal varieeal rupture of portal hypertension of liver cirrhosis. Methods Our retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent BL or SCL in our hospital from July 2008 to July 2011. To compare them among hemostasis rate, mortality, side effects, hospitalization days. Results No differences were found between groups for hemostasis rate and mortality （P〉0.05）.However, the side effects, hospitalization days of SCL were less than BL （P〈0.05）. Comclusion BL and SCL are both save,efficient, preventable ways to treat esophageal variceal rupture of portal hypertension of liver cirrhosis,but the side effects ,hospitalization days of SCL are less than those BL.
出处
《中华消化病与影像杂志（电子版）》
2012年第1期22-24,共3页
Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition)
