摘要
将散打运动竞赛评判方式与同类格斗项目相比较,尤其是与奥运会项目相比较,可以不断按照奥运会的相关要求来改进散打的竞赛评判方式,为散打运动早日成为奥运会项目在技术上铺平道路。通过对比分析发现,散打运动与拳击和跆拳道的竞赛评判方式基本一致,但最大的不同是运动员获得有效分依据边裁判员的"多数原则"不同,它们各有合理性,但在示分方式上,其他格斗项目采用"明分制",而散打竞赛实行"暗分制",不符合体育竞赛公开、透明的原则。这是散打竞赛亟待改进的地方。
To compare judging method between Sanda and similar combat sports, especially in （）lympic e- vents,allows us to improve Sanda competition judging way continuously in accordance with the relevant requirements of the Olympic Games, and pave the way in technology for Sanda becoming an Olympic sport. Through comparative analysis,this paper found out that the competition iudging method of Sanda, boxing and taekwondo are basically the same, but the major difference is that the principle of majority and each of them is reasonable. The display way of the valid point that the athletes achieve in Sanda is not open,while the others are open,and thus the display way in Sanda does not comply with the competition principles of openness and transparency. It needs to be improved urgently to Sanda competition.
出处
《首都体育学院学报》
北大核心
2012年第5期434-437,共4页
Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
关键词
散打
奥运会格斗项目
竞赛评判方式
Sanda
the combat sports in Olympic Games
competition judging method
