期刊文献+

唐代奴仆告主现象考论

Family Servant's Accusation of His Master in the Tang Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 唐代传世文献关于告主奴仆具体身份之描述扑朔迷离,且多有彰显奴仆"家人"身份之旨趣。告主家奴、家僮、役人、从人等称谓互通的特殊现象,是唐代家庭结构深刻变化与贱民地位相对提高的真实反映,而这种变化在法律制度层面之重要表达路径,即为奴仆容隐其主原则的确立。 The Tang Dynasty literature data concerning the specific identity of slaves to the main description is difficult to master, and the family servant had reflected the "family" identity purport. In the case of domestic servant' s accusation of their master, such tides as family slaves, young servant (jia -tong), employers, entourage were always mixed used, which reflects the profound change of the Tang family structure and the pariah status reflect its improvement in the Tang so- ciety, however, the principle of slaves may hide their master's wrong - doings is an significant change in the law system and an express establishment of the principle in the Tang Dynasty.
作者 陈玺
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期187-194,共8页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 国家社科基金项目(10CFX007):"唐代刑事诉讼惯例研究"
关键词 唐代 奴告主 容隐 Tang Dynasty family slave' s accusation of their master hiding
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1清·王聘珍.大戴礼记解诂[M].北京:中华书局,1983. 被引量:36
  • 2睡虎地秦墓竹简整理小组.睡虎地秦墓竹简[M].北京:文物出版社,2001. 被引量:19
  • 3张家山二四七号汉墓竹简整理小组.张家山汉墓竹简[M].北京:文物出版社,2001.. 被引量:18
  • 4宋·王溥.唐会要[M].上海:上海古籍出版社.2006. 被引量:27
  • 5[唐]长孙无忌,等.唐律疏议[M].北京:中华书局,1983. 被引量:31
  • 6清·沈家本.历代刑法考[M].邓经元,骈宇骞点校.北京:中华书局.1985. 被引量:17
  • 7(唐)吴兢编著..贞观政要[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978:302.
  • 8[后晋]刘晌,等.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975. 被引量:6
  • 9宋·钱易.南部新书[M].北京:中华书局,2002. 被引量:7
  • 10宋·李防,等.文苑英华[M].北京:中华书局,1966. 被引量:2

二级参考文献54

共引文献699

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部