期刊文献+

普瑞巴林治疗肢体神经病理性疼痛的近期疗效和安全性观察 被引量:3

The short-term efficacy and safety observation of pregabalin in the treatment of limb neuropathic pain
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价普瑞巴林用于治疗神经刺激引起肢体神经病理性疼痛的临床近期疗效及其安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年2月至2011年12月在我院住院的78例明确诊断肢体神经病理性疼痛患者的资料。本组患者均在手术前使用普瑞巴林口服进行镇痛治疗。观察口服普瑞巴林48h后患者的镇痛效果和不良反应,疼痛程度评估分别使用VAS评分(0为无痛,10为疼痛不能忍受)和LANSS评分(即利兹评分,0为无痛,16分为剧烈疼痛)。结果用药后大部分患者疼痛均有不同程度的改善,改善率为81%(63/78)。用药后48h患者的平均VAS评分从用药前的6.8±2.4降到了用药后的3.8±3.2;平均LANSS评分从用药前的11.1±3.4降到了用药后的6.3±4.7,用药前后2组评分均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。本组病例所有患者治疗期间均未出现严重的不良反应。结论普瑞巴林治疗神经源性肢体病理性疼痛疗效明确,不良反应较轻,发生率较低。 Objective To evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of limb neuropathic pain caused by neural stimulation. Methods 78 patients definitely diagnosed as limb neuropathic pain was adopted by our hospital from February 2011 to December 2011, whose data were retrospectively analyzed. They all received oral pregabalin preoperatively. The analgesic effects and side effects were observed in 48 hours after oral pregabalin administration. The severity of pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) (no pain 0, severe pain 10) and the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) scale (no pain 0, severe pain 16). Results Most of the patients received pain relief to some extent after medication, and the improvement rate was 81% (63/78). The mean VAS score reduced from 6.8±2.4 to 3.8±3.2, while the mean LANSS score reduced from 11.1±3.4 to 6.3±4.7 in 48 hours after medication. There were statistical differences in both VAS and LANSS scores between pre- and post- medication (P〈0.05). No severe side effect was found in patients in our group during the treating therapy. Conclusions Pregabalin is effective in treating limb neuropathic pain, with minor side effects and lower incidence.
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2012年第4期362-364,371,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
关键词 普瑞巴林 神经病理性疼痛 疗效 安全性 Pregabalin Neuropathic pain Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1神经病理性疼痛诊治专家共识[J].中华内科杂志,2009,48(6):526-528. 被引量:37
  • 2Dahl JB,Mathiesen O,Moiniche S. Protective premedication':an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of post-operative pain[J].Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2004,(03):1130-1136. 被引量:1
  • 3Van Seventer R,Feister HA,Young JP Jr. Efficacy andtolerability of twice-daily pregabalin for treating pain and related sleep interference in postherpetic neuralgia:a 13-week,randomized trial[J].Current Medical Research and Opinion,2006,(02):375-384. 被引量:1
  • 4Rosenstock J,Tuchman M,LaMoreaux L. Pregabalin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy:a double-blind,placebo-controlled trial[J].Pain,2004,(05):628-638.doi:10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.11.006. 被引量:1
  • 5Mathiesen O,Jacobsen LS,Holm HE. Pregabalin and dexamethasone for postoperative pain control:a randomized controlled study in hip arthroplasty[J].British Journal of Anaesthesia,2008,(04):535-541.doi:10.1093/bja/aen215. 被引量:1
  • 6Fassoulaki A,Stamatakis E,Petropoulos G. Gabapentin attenuates late but not acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy[J].European Journal of Anaesthesiology,2006,(03):136-141. 被引量:1
  • 7Luo ZD,Calcutt NA,Higuera ES. Injury type-specific calcium channel alpha 2 delta-1 subunit up-regulation in rat neuropathic pain models correlates with antiallodynic effects ofgabapentin[J].Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,2002,(11):1199-1205.doi:10.1097/MOT.0b013e328339d172. 被引量:1
  • 8Prakash,Prabhu LV,Rai R. Teratogenic effects of the anti-convulsant gabapentin in mice[J].Singapore Medical Journal,2008,(01):47-53.doi:10.1086/604729. 被引量:1
  • 9White PF,Tufanogullari B,Taylor J. The effect of pregabalin on anxiety and sedation levels:a dose-ranging study[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,2009,(10):1140-1145. 被引量:1
  • 10Bisgaard T,Klarskov B,Kehlet H. Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled tria[J].Annals of Surgery,2003,(11):651-660. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Merskey H, Bogduk N//Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Task force on taxonomy of the international association for the study of pain. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 2Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, et al. Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neuro l,2003,60 : 1524-1534. 被引量:1
  • 3Cruccu G, Anand P, Attal N, et al. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Eur J Neural,2004, 1 : 153-162. 被引量:1
  • 4Galer BS, Jensen MP. Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Scale. Neurology,1997,48:332-338. 被引量:1
  • 5Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1975,1:277-299. 被引量:1
  • 6Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain, 1987,30 : 191-197. 被引量:1
  • 7Garcia-Larrea L, Convers P, Magnin M, et al. Laser-evoked potential abnormalities in central pain patients: the influence of spontaneous and provoked pain. Brain, 2002,125 (Pt 12) :2766- 2781. 被引量:1
  • 8Moisset X, Bouhassira D. Brain imaging of neuropathic pain. Neuroimage ,2007,37 Suppl 1 : S80-88. 被引量:1
  • 9Attal N, Cruccu G, HaanpaaM, et al. EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol, 2006,13 : 1153-1169. 被引量:1
  • 10Finnerup NB, Otto M, McQuay H J, et al. Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: an evidence based proposal. Pain, 2005,118 : 289 -305. 被引量:1

共引文献36

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部