期刊文献+

改良Galveston术式在脊柱-骨盆固定融合术中的应用 被引量:1

The application of modified Galveston technique in spine-pelvis immobilization and fusion surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨通过改良的Galveston技术向髂骨内植入髂骨螺钉在脊柱骨盆固定融合术中的疗效。方法 2005年10月-2010年9月在腰骶部肿瘤、结核、陈旧骶骨骨折手术中应用改良Galveston术式进行脊柱-骨盆固定融合术(腰骶髂融合术)10例。男7例,女3例;年龄46-62岁,平均58岁。随访时间10-25个月,平均16个月。通过术前、术后影像学及随访症状缓解标准评价手术效果。结果手术时间190-250分钟,平均210分钟。术中未出现神经血管损伤等并发症。平均出血量1200ml。术后未出现感染、内固定物失败病例。按中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱学组腰背痛手术评定标准评价,优3例,良5例,可1例,优良率达90%。结论通过改良的Galveston技术向髂骨内植入髂骨螺钉在脊柱骨盆固定融合术中可获得满意的临床疗效。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of the modified Galveston technique by implanting iliac screws into the ilia in spine-pelvis immobilization and fusion surgery. Methods 10 cases composed oflumbosacral tumors, tuberculosis and old sacral fractures were treated by modified Galveston technique to immobilize and fuse spine-pelvis ( lumbosacro- iliac fusion ) during October 2005 to September 2010. 7 males and 3 females; age 46 to 62 years, mean 58 years. Follow up 10 to 25 month, average 16 month. Evaluate the effects of surgery using preoperative and postoperative imaging and follow-up remission criteria. Results The operative time was 190 to 250 minute, with an average of 210 minute. Mean blood loss was 1200ml.Neither complications such as nerve and vessel injury occurred during operation, nor does infection or fixation failure post operation. According to clinical outcome judgement criterion of surgical treatment for low back pain formulated by the spine group of Chinese Orthopaedic Association, there was excellent outcome in 3 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 1 case, with the excellent and good rate of 90%. Conclusion The modified Galveston technique by implanting screws into the ilia could present satisfactory clinical efficacy in spine-pelvis immobilization and fusion sur- gery.
出处 《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 CAS 2012年第4期39-42,共4页 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
关键词 Galveston技术 髂骨螺钉 脊柱骨盆固定融合术 腰骶髂融合术 The Galveston technique Iliac screw Spine-pelvis immobilization and fusion Lumbosacroiliac fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Gunterberg B,Romanus B,Stener B.Pelvic strength after majoramputation of the sacrum:an experimental study[J].Acta OrthopScand,1976,47﹙6﹚:635-642. 被引量:1
  • 2Simpson AH,Porter A,Davis A,et al.Cephalad sacral resectionwith a combined extended ilioinguinal and posterior approach[J].J Bone Jiont Surg﹙Am﹚,1995,77﹙3﹚:405-411. 被引量:1
  • 3Allen BL JI,Ferguson RI.Spine,1982,7﹙3﹚:276-284. 被引量:1
  • 4肖建如,贾连顺,陈华江,魏海峰,杨兴海,陈德玉,朱秋峰.高位骶骨肿瘤切除与重建方式探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(8):575-577. 被引量:49
  • 5Abumi K,Saita M,Lida T,et al.Reduction and fixation of sacro-iliac joint dislocation by the combined use of S1 pedicle screwsand the galveston technique.Spine,2000,25﹙15﹚:1977-1983. 被引量:1
  • 6Early S,Mahar A,Oka R,et al.Biomechanical comparison of lum-bosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and ColoradoⅡsacrop-elvic fixation:advantage of using locked proximal fixation.Spine,2005,30﹙12﹚:13962-1401. 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

  • 1Tomita K, Tsuchiya H. Total sacrectomy and reconstruction for huge sacral tumor. Spine, 1990, 15:1223-1227. 被引量:1
  • 2Paul W, Olav L, Shinsuke S, et al. Total sacrectomy and reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res, 2000, 381: 192-203. 被引量:1
  • 3Stener B,Gunterberg B. High amputation of the sacrum for extirpation of tumor. Spine, 1978, 3:351-366. 被引量:1
  • 4Grunterberg B, Romanus B, Stener B. pelvic strength after major amputation of the sacrum. An experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand, 1976, 47: 635-645. 被引量:1
  • 5McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis of Lumbosacral fixation. Spine, 1992, 17:235-243. 被引量:1
  • 6Allen BL, Ferguson RL. A pictorial guide to the GaLveston LRI pevic fixtion technique. Cont Orthop,1983, 7:51-61. 被引量:1
  • 7Gokaslan ZL, Romsdahl MM, Kroll SS, et al. Total sacrectomy and Galveston L-rod reconstruction for malignant neoplasms. Technical note. J Neurosurg, 1997, 87:781-787. 被引量:1

共引文献48

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部