期刊文献+

The Importance of Altruistic Empathy and Collaborative Negotiation in Public-Private Partnerships

The Importance of Altruistic Empathy and Collaborative Negotiation in Public-Private Partnerships
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The motivation in public-private partnerships (PPPs) is to harness the strengths of public and private partners to deliver essential public services. The ability to transfer risk to the private sector in PPP has been one of the reasons why the public sector relies on the private sector to participate in the development of infrastructure projects. In most instances, the public sector also believes that the private sector can fund the project at a lower cost. The private sector on the other hand, believes that they could achieve a strong financial return based on the concessions that the public sector will provide. If the sectors feel altruistic empathy to each other, they will realize that their original goals are not achievable. However, having understood the other sector's needs and constraints, collaborative negotiation will yield a set of common goals. There are no commonly agreed frameworks on collaborative negotiation before PPP is formally established. The objective of this paper is to use deductive analysis to develop a conceptual framework for inquiring into the motivations of the public and private sectors during negotiation. This framework will provide insights on the extent of altruistic empathy of both sectors at the onset and how this altruistic empathy frames collaborative negotiation. This paper shows that collaborative negotiation will influence the success of partnerships and altruistic empathy is an important preamble to collaborative negotiation. This paper provides a frame of reference for future study using other research methods for further validation.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2012年第6期827-836,共10页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 altruistic empathy collaborative negotiation public-private partnerships (PPPs) 合作伙伴关系 私营部门 谈判 基础设施项目 概念框架 协同 利他主义 公共部门
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

  • 1Alderman, N., & Ivory, C. (2007). Partnering in major contracts: Paradox and metaphor. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 386-393. 被引量:1
  • 2Bennett, E., James, S., & Grohmann, P. (2000). Joint venture publicprivatepartnershipsJor urban environmental services. New York: United Nations Development Program and Yale University. 被引量:1
  • 3Besser, L. (December 1, 2007). Toll costs blamed for low patronage. Sydney Morning Herald. 被引量:1
  • 4Brinkerhoff, D., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2011). Public private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31, 2-14. 被引量:1
  • 5Brown, K., & Ryan, N. (2003). Redefining govemment-community relations through service agreements. Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 9(1 ), 21-30. 被引量:1
  • 6Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships [CCPPP]. (1999). About the council for public private partnerships. 被引量:1
  • 7Carroll, P., & Steane, P. (2000). Public private partnerships: Sectoral perspective. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Public private partnerships: Theory and practice in internationalperspective (pp. 36-57). London and New York: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 8Carroll, P., & Steane, P. (2002). Australia, the new public management and the new millennium. In K. McLauglin, S. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management." Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 9ISalTOll, t'., dE 3teane, v. 12oo2). Australia, me new pUDllC management ana me new millennium. In K. McLauglln, ~5. Us0orne, dE E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management." Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 10Gates, D., & Steane, P. (2009). Altruisnv---An alternative value in policy formation and decision making. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(10), 962-978. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部