摘要
目的比较护理干预及传统护理方式对剖产后恢复的疗效。方法将185例剖宫产产妇随机分为两组,观察组(95例)采用护理干预模式,对照组(90例)采用传统护理方式,比较两组产妇术后疼痛分级,排气、进食、泌乳、拔管时间,以及乳房恢复情况。结果观察组术后疼痛0级例数明显多于对照组,术后疼痛3级例数明显少于对照组。观察组术后排气、进食、泌乳、拔管时间明显短于对照组,且术后泌乳不通畅、乳房胀痛及乳房有硬结的例数均显著少于对照组。结论较传统护理而言,对剖宫产产妇采用护理干预模式可有效减轻术后疼痛,缩短术后排气、进食、泌乳、拔管时间,降低乳房不适发生率。
Objective To compare the effect of nursing intervention and traditional nursing on the recovery after caesarean section. Methods One hundred and eighty-five pregnant women with caesarean section were random- ly divided into two groups. The study group （n=95） received nursing intervention, and the control group （n=90） re- ceived traditional nursing. The pain classification, exhausting, feeding, lactation, tube drawing time, and recovery of breast were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of pain at 0 grade in the study group was obviously higher than that in the control group, while the pain at 3 grade was obviously lower. The exhausting, feeding, lactation, tube drawing time in the study group were obviously shorter than that in the control group, and the rates of weak lacta- tion, swollen breast and harden were lower. Conclusion Compared with the traditional nursing, the nursing interven- tion on caesarean section can lighten pain after operation, shorten exhausting, feeding, lactation, tube drawing time, and lower the rate of discomfort of breast.
出处
《海南医学》
CAS
2012年第16期149-151,共3页
Hainan Medical Journal
关键词
护理干预
剖宫产
术后恢复
Nursing intervention
Caesarean section
Recovery after operation
