期刊文献+

鼻咽癌的CT与MRI诊断效果对比分析 被引量:8

Comparison of CT and MRI in Diagnosing Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析鼻咽癌(NPC)患者局部侵犯情况的CT诊断与MRI诊断效果。方法:将我院病理实验证实为鼻咽癌患者的初诊资料进行整理分析,选择治疗前经过CT诊断及MRI诊断的患者71例,多名专家共同对其鼻咽部位的扫描片进行对比分析,统计两种影像诊断方法对侵犯的检出率。结果:在对鼻咽部位的影像学诊断中,CT诊断的检出率为43.6%(31/71),MRI诊断的检出率为70.4%(50/71);在对颅底部位的影像学诊断中,CT诊断的检出率为22.5%(16/71),MRI诊断的检出率为56.3%(40/71)。结论:在对鼻咽癌(NPC)患者进行局部侵犯情况的影像学诊断中应注重MRI诊断结果,其无论是对鼻咽部还是对颅底的检测均比CT诊断明显。 Objective: To conduct a comparative analysis on the diagnostic effects between CT scan and MRI in diagnosing local invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( NPC ). Method: Preliminary diagnosis data of the patients who were definitely diagnosed with NPC at pathological test in our hospital were sorted out. 71 cases of patients who had undergone both CT scan and MRI before the treatment were selected. Comparative analysis was performed on the images of nasopharyngeal sites by several experts, to obtain a statistic result for the detection rates of invasion for both imaging techniques. Result: For the imaging diagnosis of nasopharyn- geal invasion, the detection rate of CT scan was 43.6% (31/71) , while that of MRI was 70.4% (50/71 ). For the imaging diagnosis of local invasion to basis cranii, the detection rate of CT scan was 22.5% ( 16/ 71 ) , while that of MR1 was 56.3 % (40/71 ). Conelusion:MRI result appeared to be a preferential imaging technique in diagnosing local invasion for the patients with NPC. The detection rates of nasopharyngeal invasion and local invasion to basis cranii with MRI scan are both higher than those with CT scan.
作者 陈萍
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2012年第9期1249-1251,共3页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 鼻咽癌 CT诊断 MRI诊断 对比分析 Nasopha,yngeal carcinoma CT diagnosis MRI diagnosis Comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1卢丽霞,赵充,韩非,吴少雄,卢泰祥,崔念基.鼻咽癌照射靶体积划定的临床探讨[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(2):81-85. 被引量:24
  • 2孙颖,马骏,黄莹,唐玲珑,李立,王岩,卢泰祥.鼻咽癌的CT与MRI对比研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(14):788-791. 被引量:53
  • 3汤轶强,罗伟,何智纯,孙颖,卢泰祥.三维适形放射治疗鼻咽癌的疗效及局部复发的因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(3):330-334. 被引量:20
  • 4王立侠,周纯武,连世东,欧阳汉.鼻咽癌的MRI表现——附180例病例分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(6):854-857. 被引量:13
  • 5Olmi P,Fallai C,Colagrend S,et al.Stnging and following up nasopharyngesl carcinoma:magnetic resonance imaging versus computerizedttomography.Intt Radiat Oneoh Biolt Phys,1995,32(3):795-800. 被引量:1
  • 6Chung NN,'ling LL,Hsu WC,et al.Impact of magnetic resonance imaging versus CT on nasopharyngeal carcinoma:primary tumor target delineation for radiotherapy.Head Neck,2004,26:241-246. 被引量:1
  • 7Maeuso,AA,Harnsberger HR,Muraki AS,et al.Computedtomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes:normal anatomy,variant of normal and applications in staging head and neck cancer.partll:pathology.Radiology,1996,110 (10):987-990. 被引量:1
  • 8King AD,Ahuja AT,Leung SF,et al.Neck node metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma:MR imaging of patterns of disease.Head Neck,2000,22:275-281. 被引量:1
  • 9[3]Ng SH,Chang TC,Ko SF,et al.Nasopharyngeal carci-noma:MRI and CT assessment[J].Neuroradiology,1997,39 (10):741-746. 被引量:1
  • 10[4]Cheung YK,Sham JS,Chan FL,et al.Computed Tomo-graphy of paranasopharyngael spaces:normal variations and criteria for tumor extension[J].Clin Radiol,1992,45(2):109-113. 被引量:1

共引文献31

同被引文献35

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部