摘要
认识的语境论在回应怀疑论难题的过程中,出现了多种修正的形式,包括以相对标准修正的语境论,以事实作为原因修正的语境论,以妥协方式修正的语境论,以证据修正的语境论,以预设修正的语境论。这些不同形式的语境论遇到了"斑马悖论"和摩尔主义的反驳,但语境论者认为这两个反驳不一定有效,正是它们忽视了语境的作用,才导致悖论的出现,要解决怀疑论难题,还得回到特定语境中去。
Many amendatory forms of epistemic contextualism have been emerged in the course of sol- ving skeptical paradox. As the author named, they are relative criterion eontextualism, fact - as - cause contextualism, transigent contextualism, evidential contextualism and presuppositional contextualism, which come into the objections of zebra paradox and Mooreanism. But Contextualists argue that the two ob- jections are not efficiency, because they ignore the role of context. If we want to solve skeptical paradox, we should come back to contextualism.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第8期117-126,共10页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金后期资助项目“科学哲学的语境重建”(项目编号:09FZX011)
山西省留学基金项目“科学认知的机制与表征模型研究”(项目编号:0905502)的阶段性成果
