摘要
司法能动主义源于美国,是在司法独立、三权分立、宪政体制等条件下司法权发展到一定阶段的产物,在历史上发挥了重要作用。即使如此,美国最高法院的大法官也很少声称自己是司法能动主义者,究其原因,司法能动主义除与民主原则相违外,如何运用、如何制约,"度"的问题也是难点,任何抽象性的方法和结论都不可避免地会招致批评。司法能动主义理论观点纷呈,在分析美国司法理念和司法史基础上,对司法能动主义运用特点进行试探性的分析有助于对该词在实践中的理解。
Judicial activism,originated in the USA,was born with the staged development of judicial power on the condition of judicial independence,separation of the three powers and constitutionalism,which has played an important role in history. Even so,the Supreme Court Justices seldom claim themselves to be judicial activists. The reasons are that judicial activism not only goes against democracy,but how to apply it and restrict it fairly and acceptably is also very difficult to handle,and any abstract approach and conclusion will inevitably result in criticisim. There are various theoretical outlooks in judicial activism,so to conduct a tentative analysis on the application of judicial activism on the basis of analysing judicial theory and history in the USA is helpful to the understanding of judicial activism in practice.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第7期63-69,287,共7页
Academics
关键词
司法能动主义
运用
司法权
judicial activism
application
judicial power
