期刊文献+

放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎疗效比较 被引量:20

Comparison of the Curative Effect of Radial and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Waves in Treating the Plantar Fasciitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效。方法:52例足底筋膜炎患者被分为放散状冲击波治疗组(放散组)与聚焦状冲击波治疗组(聚焦组),每组26例。放散组患者治疗频率为5 Hz,治疗探头15 mm,治疗压力2~3bar,冲击波次数2000,手持压力中-高。聚焦组患者治疗电压7~8 kV,冲击频率60次/min,冲击次数1200次。所有患者均治疗3次,每次治疗间隔7天,治疗部位均为患侧跟骨内侧结节。治疗前和末次治疗后4周后和12周后,采用视觉模拟评级法(VAS)评估患者治疗前后疼痛强度。结果:治疗前两组患者VAS评分相近,末次治疗4周后及12周后,VAS评分均显著低于治疗前,两组之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);本次治疗4周后放散组VAS评分显著低于聚焦组,两组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),放散组的治愈率和有效率分别为26.9%和100%,聚焦组的治愈率和有效率分别为15.4%和84.6%;12周时两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),放散组的治愈率和有效率分别为76.9%和100%,聚焦组的治愈率和有效率分别为73.1%和96.6%。结论:放散状冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎显效快,但远期疗效与聚焦状冲击波无明显差异。 Objective To compare the curative effect of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Methods Fifty two patients with plantar fasciitis were included in the study,26 of them received radial extraeorporeal shock waves therapy(group R) and the others re ceived focused extraeorporeal shock waves therapy (group F). 5 Hz impulses of radial extracorporeal shock waves was applied for group R for 15 mm,2,000 impulses per session,and 2-3 bar air pressure. 1 Hz impulses was applied for group F for 15 mm, 1,200 impulses per session,and at the voltage of 7-8 kV. Each patient received three sessions of treatment with an interval of 1 week. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the extent of pain before the therapy and 4 or 12 weeks after the last therapy. Results Prior to the therapy,the VAS scores were similar for both groups. VAS scores of 4 and 12 weeks after the therapy were significantly lower than before therapy (P 〈 0.05),and were lower in group F than in group R 4 weeks after the therapy (P 〈 0.05). The curative rate and effective rate were 26.9% and 100% in group R,and 15.4% and 84.6% in group F,respectively. The curative rate and effective rate were similar between group R (76.9% and 100%)and group F (73.1% and 96.6%) after 12 weeks ofter therapy (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Radial extracorporeal shock waves therapy showed a bettereffectiveness for treating plantar fasciitis in short-term,while there was no significant long-term difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups.
出处 《中国运动医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期523-525,532,共4页 Chinese Journal of Sports Medicine
关键词 放散状冲击波 聚焦状冲击波 足底筋膜炎 疼痛 radial extracorporeal shock waves,focused extracorporeal shock waves,plantar fasciiris, pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Rompe JD,Zoellnen J, Nafe B. Shock wave therapy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2001, (387):72- 82. 被引量:1
  • 2孙德海,纪春梅,姜长林,毛仲霞,李绍臣.DOLORCLAST~放散状冲击波治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床观察[J].中国伤残医学,2010,18(1):70-71. 被引量:17
  • 3Buchbinder R. Clinical practice. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med, 2004,350 (21) :2159-2166. 被引量:1
  • 4韦敏克,梁斌,尹东,李宏宇.胫骨骨折术后骨不连治疗方法的疗效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(12):904-907. 被引量:37
  • 5Ibrahim MI, Donatelli RA, Schmitz C, et al. Chronic plantar fasciitis treated with two sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Foot Ankle Int, 2010,31 (5) : 391-397. 被引量:1
  • 6Moretti B, Garofalo R, Patella V, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in runners with a symptomatic heel spur. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2006,14 (10):1029- 1032. 被引量:1
  • 7Othman AM,Ragab EM. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of chronic plantar faseiitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010,130(11 ) : 1343-1347. 被引量:1
  • 8Slavkovie A,Radovanovic M,Vlajkovic M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management for pediatric urolithiasis. Urol Res, 2006,34 (5) : 315-320. 被引量:1
  • 9Rompe JD,Hopf C ,Nafe B ,et al. Low-energy extraeorporeal shock wave therapy for painful heel:a prospective controlled single-blind study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1996,115 (2) :75-79. 被引量:1
  • 10Ogden JA,Alvarez R,Levitt R,et al. Shock wave therapy for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis. Clin Orthop,2001, (387) :47-59. 被引量:1

二级参考文献14

  • 1梁斌,李宏宇,李丽春,韦建勋,李荣祝,何大光,梁建波.体外冲击波刺激成骨作用对骨不连间隙的影响[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(38):92-94. 被引量:7
  • 2王根林,杨惠林,牛国旗,周云,谢杰,唐天驷.交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折并发症分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(22):1681-1683. 被引量:22
  • 3张亚非,庞桂根,张涛.髓内钉治疗胫腓骨骨折适应范围及疗效探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(22):1693-1696. 被引量:29
  • 4Wang Fs, Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chung H, Chen RF, Yang KD. Physical shock wave mediates membrane hyperpolarization and Ras activation for osteogenesis in human bone marrow stroreal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comrnun, 2001, 287:648 - 655. 被引量:1
  • 5GollwitzerH, DiehlP, yon KorffA, eta. l Extracorporeal shock wavetherapy for chronic painfulheel syndrome: a prospective, double blind,randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a new electromagnetic shockwave device [J]. FootAnkle Surg, 2007, 46(5) :348-357. 被引量:1
  • 6Abed JM, McClure SR, YaegerMJ, eta. l Immunohistochemical e--valuation of substance P and calcitonin gene--related peptide in skinand periosteum after extracorporeal shock wave therapy and radialpressurewave therapy in sheep [J]. Am JVetRes, 2007, 68(3) :323-328. 被引量:1
  • 7Webb LX.Bone defect nonunion of thc lower extremity[J].Orthopaed,2001,16:387-397. 被引量:1
  • 8Pihlajamaki HK,Salminen ST,Bostman OM.The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2002,16:392-402. 被引量:1
  • 9Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society.Nonunion following intramedullary nailing of the femur with and without reaming:results of a mulitcenter randomized clinical trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2003,85:2093-2096. 被引量:1
  • 10Weresh M J,Hakanson R,Stover MD,et al.Failure of exchange reamed intramedullay nails for ununited femoral shaft fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2000,14:335-338. 被引量:1

共引文献51

同被引文献234

引证文献20

二级引证文献207

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部