摘要
玄学、理学均是通过诠释儒道经典而建构起本体论学说的。为了建构本体论,玄学的经典诠释方法是本末论,理学的经典诠释方法则是体用论。一方面,玄学的本末之辨深刻地影响了理学的体用之辨。另一方面,理学的体用之辨解决了玄学本末之辨所留下的问题。理学家通过体用之辨的本体诠释方法,才真正完成了建构儒家形上学的任务。
Both Neo- Taoism and Neo Confucianism construct the Original Substance theory through interpreting classics of Confucianism and Taoism. In order to construct the Original Substance theory, the interpretation method of Neo - Taoism is Original - terminal theory and that of Neo - Confu- cianism is Substance - function theory. On the one hand, the argument on Original - terminal of Neo - Taoism has a profound influence on Substance - function of Neo - Confucianism, on the other hand, the argument on Substance - function of Neo - Confucianism solves the questions that Neo - Taoism hasn＇t completed. Neo- Confucians truly accomplished the mission to construct Confucian metaphysics through arguing about the Substance- function.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第7期102-112,共11页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“玄学与理学的学术思想理路研究”(项目编号:07BZX036)的阶段性成果
关键词
玄学
理学
诠释经典方法
本末
体用
本体论
Neo- Taoism
Neo- Confucianism
Interpretation Method
Original- terminal
Sub- stance - function
