期刊文献+

联盟规范系统及其规范能力极限 被引量:3

On the Limitation of the Power of Coalitional Normative Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 联盟规范系统(coalitional normative system,简称CNS)通过选择性地限制联盟的联合行动来对规范系统(normative system,简称NS)进行扩展.扩展了ATL的语义,提出了Coordinate-ATL(Co-ATL),用于对CNS进行形式化.为了刻画其规范能力的极限,确定了Co-ATL的两个语言片段,分别对应于两类不可改变的系统属性.对NS和CNS之间的关系进行了讨论,表明所得到的结果可以更好地界定NS的能力极限.此外,引入了对执行历史进行编码的有限状态机,进一步对CNS进行了扩展,提出了CNS-M.可以证明,关于CNS能力极限的界定在该扩展下保持稳定. Coalitional Normative System (CNS) is an extension of a Normative System (NS) by enabling selective constraining a coalition's joint behavior. The study extends the semantics of ATL and proposes Coordinated ATL (Co-ATL) to support the formalizing of CNS. The paper classifies all the CNSs that control the same coalition into the same class and characterizes the power limitation of each such class by identifying two fragments of Co-ATL language corresponding to two types of system properties that are unchangeable. The relation between NS and CNS is discussed, and it turns out that by the result better characterize the power limitation of NS. Moreover, the study extends further the CNS by including a finite state machine encoding the execution history, and results show that the power limitation characterization for CNS is invariant under this extension.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期1796-1804,共9页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(60503021 60721002 60875038 61105069)
关键词 规范系统 交互时态逻辑 联盟 并发博弈结构 normative system ATL coalition concurrent game structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Shoham Y, Tennenholtz M. On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies. In: Proc. of the AAAI'92. 1992. 276-281. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 1867178. 被引量:1
  • 2Shoham Y, Tennenholtz M. On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-Line design. In: Agre PE, Rosenschein SJ, eds. Proc. of the Computational Theories of Interaction and Agency. 1996. 597-618. Idol: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00007-N]. 被引量:1
  • 3Wooldridge M, van der Hock W. On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. Journal of Applied Logic, 2005,3(3-4):396-420. Idol: 10.1016/j.jal.2005.04.006]. 被引量:1
  • 4van der Hoek W, Roberts M, Wooldridge M. Knowledge and social laws. In: Proc. of the AAMAS 2005. 2005. 674-681. [doi: 10. 1145/1082473.1082576]. 被引量:1
  • 5van der Hoek W, Roberts M, Wooldridge M. Social laws in alternating time: Effectiveness feasibility, and synthesis. Synthese, 2007,156(1):1-19. [doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9072-6]. 被引量:1
  • 6Agotnes T, van der Hoek W, Juan A, Rodriguez-Aguilar CS, Wooldridge M. On the logic of normative systems. In: Pro~. of the IJCAI 2007. 2007.1175-1180. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/IJCAI/2007/IJCAI07-190.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 7Agotnes T, van der Hoek W, Tennenholtz M, Wooldridge M. Power in normative systems. In: Proe. of the AAMAS 2009. 2009. 145-152. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 1082576. 被引量:1
  • 8Alur R, Henzinger TA, Kupferman O. Alternating-time temporal logic. In: Proc. of the FOCS'97. 1997. 100-109. http://www-sst. informatik.tu-eottbus.de/~db/doc/People/LNCS/papers/l$360023.pdf [doi: 10.1145/585265.585270]. 被引量:1
  • 9Alur R, Henzinger TA, Kupferman O. Alternating-Time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM, 2002,49(5):672-713. [doi: 10.1145/ 585265.585270]. 被引量:1
  • 10Pauly M, Wooldridge M. Logic for mechanism design--A manifesto. In: Proc. of the 2003 Workshop on Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent Systems (GTDT 2003). 2003. http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~mjw/pubs/gtdt2003.ps.gz. 被引量:1

同被引文献4

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部