期刊文献+

基于CBCT成像技术的颜面部不对称分类研究初探 被引量:9

Preliminary study of classification of facial asymmetry based on cone-beam computed tomography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过锥体束CT(cone-beam computerized tomography,CBCT)资料分析颜面不对称患者颌骨的三维形态特征以及其颜面部不对称的发生部位。方法对20例标准组及41例错畸形患者分别使用CBCT采集颅面部数据,使用Dol-phin11.0软件对骨组织进行三维重建,选择上下颌骨的部分标记点进行不对称系数的测量。结果上颌骨不对称发生率为20.0%,下颌支不对称发生率为50.0%,下颌体不对称发生率为30.0%。安氏Ⅲ类组上颌骨不对称发生率为38.1%,下颌支不对称发生率为47.6%,下颌体不对称发生率为61.9%。安氏Ⅱ类组不对称发生率为20.0%,下颌支不对称发生率为50.0%,下颌体不对称发生率为35.0%。安氏Ⅲ类组中2例(9.5%)患者仅发生上颌不对称。结论颜面不对称主要表现为下颌骨形态异常,上颌骨不对称通常伴随着下颌骨的不对称,安氏Ⅲ类患者颜面部不对称的发生率较对照组高。 Objective To analyze the three-dimensional morphological features of the jaws of patients with facial asymmetry and the locations based on CBCT evaluation.Methods CBCT images of 61 patients were taken,including 20 subjects as the control group,and 41 patients with maloclusion.The Dolphin 11.0 software was used for the 3D reconstruction of bony tissues.Asymmetry coefficients were calculated for some landmarks in the maxilla,mandibular body and the mandibular ramus regions.Results Proportions of subjects with maxillary region asymmetry increased in class Ⅲ maloclusion group(38.1%),but not in classⅡ maloclusion group(20.0%),compared with that in the control group(20.0%).Subjects(61,9%) showing asymmetry in the mandibular body regions in class Ⅲ maloclusion group were more than those in the control group(30.0%)and in class Ⅱ maloclusion group(35.0%).About 50% subjects showed asymmetry in the mandibular ramus regions.For 2 subjects,asymmetry was shown solely in the maxillary region.Conclusions Facial asymmetry is mainly characterized by the morphological abnormality of the maxilla.The asymmetry of the mandible is often accompanied with the asymmetry of the maxilla.The rate of facial asymmetry in class Ⅲ maloclusion group is higher than that in the control group.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2012年第6期328-332,共5页 Stomatology
基金 南京医科大学科技发展基金重点项目(2011NJMU216)
关键词 锥体束CT 颜面部不对称 cone-beam computed tomography facial asymmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sándor GK,McGuire TP,Ylikontiola LP,et al.Management of fa-cial asymmetry[J].Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2007,19(3):395-422. 被引量:1
  • 2Lippold C,Kruse-Losler B,Danesh G,et al.Treatment of hemimandib-ular hyperplasia:the biological basis of condylectomy[J].Br J OralMaxillofac Surg,2007,45(5):353-360. 被引量:1
  • 3Severt TR,Proffit WR.The prevalence of facial asymmetry in thedentofacial deformities population at the University of North Caro-lina[J].Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg,1997,12(3):171-176. 被引量:1
  • 4Samman N,Tong AC,Cheung DL,et al.Analysis of 300 dentofa-cial deformities in Hong Kong[J].Int J Adult Orthodon Orthog-nath Surg,1992,7(3):181-185. 被引量:1
  • 5Cavalcanti MG,Rocha SS,Vannier MW.Craniofacial measurementsbased on 3D-CT volume rendering:implications for clinical applica-tions[J].Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2004,33(3):170-176. 被引量:1
  • 6Gracco A,Iombardol,Cozzani M,et al.Quantitative evaluationwith CBCT of palatal bone thickness in growing patients[J].Pro-rorthod,2006,7(20):164-174. 被引量:1
  • 7Lucia HS,Cevidanes,Martin A,et al.Profit Image analysis andsuper imposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographymodels[J].Am J Orthod Dent Orthop,2006,129(5):611-618. 被引量:1
  • 8Honey OB,Scarfe WC,Hilgers MJ,et al.Accuracy of cone-beamcomputed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint:Comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography[J].AM J Orthod Dentofacial Orthrop,2007,132(4):429-438. 被引量:1
  • 9Akitoshi K,Masami F,Masahito M.3D-CT evaluation of facial a-symmetry[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod,2005,99(2):212-20. 被引量:1
  • 10Danforth RA,Dus I,Mah J.3-D volume imaging for dentistry:anew dimension[J].J Calif Dent Assoc,2003,31(11):817-823. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1邵金陵,李东,张治.安氏Ⅱ类一分类错合的硬、软组织改变[J].口腔医学,1996,16(1):12-13. 被引量:6
  • 2卢小妹,牛胜德,梁岩岭,曹昌武,王翠英.石家庄市1872名大学生错畸形调查分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2006,20(3):313-313. 被引量:5
  • 3Harvati K. Quantitative analysis of Neanderthal tempora bone morphology using three- dimensional geometric mor phometrics[J].Am J Phys Anthropol, 2003, 120(4):323- 338. 被引量:1
  • 4Halazonetis DJ. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis [J].Am J Orthod Dentofaclal Orthop, 2004, 125(5):571- 581. 被引量:1
  • 5Franchi L, T Baccetti, and JA MeNamara, Jr. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth I-J~. The Angle orthodontist, 2001, 71(2):83-89. 被引量:1
  • 6Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class Ⅱ division Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children[J]. The Angle orthodontist, 1997, 67(2):111-120. 被引量:1
  • 7Rothstein T, Yoon-Tarlie C. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class Ⅱ, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part 1: characteristics of size, form, and position [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(3) :320-332. 被引量:1
  • 8Brezniak N, Arad A, Heller M, et al. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class Ⅱ Division 2 malocclusion[J].The Angle orthodontist, 2002, 72(3):251-257. 被引量:1
  • 9Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion[J]. The Angle orthodontist, 2002, 72( 5):456-463. 被引量:1
  • 10Maj G, Lucchese P, Zerbinati G. Class Ⅱ, division 1 malocclusion in a skeletal pattern of a Class Ⅱ, division 2 [J]. L Orthodontie francalse, 1987, 58 Pt 2:649-657. 被引量:1

共引文献2

同被引文献90

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部