期刊文献+

企业声誉与媒体权威性在证券市场传闻澄清中的作用——关于上市公司应对证券市场传闻的实证研究 被引量:6

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Media Authority in Rumor Clarification—An Empirical Study on Coping with the Security Market Rumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 发布澄清公告是上市公司应对市场传闻的主要途径。然而,在中国证券市场中,澄清公告却澄而不清,其原因在于某些因素会影响澄清公告的有效性。文章主要围绕信息内容(否认措辞)和信息来源(澄清企业的声誉与传闻媒体的权威性)两类影响因素进行探讨。研究发现,否认措辞将对澄清效果产生影响,并且两者的关系同时受到企业声誉和媒体权威性的调节作用,企业声誉越差,媒体权威性越高,否认措辞对澄清效果的影响越大。研究结论检验了心理学理论在证券市场中的有效性,拓展了金融市场领域的研究范畴,同时为上市公司应对市场传闻提供了新的思路。 Clarification announcements are often used to rebut market rumors. However, clarification announcements make nothing clear in the Chinese stock market, which is caused by some factors. The paper carries out a study on two types of important factors. The results show that, the denial wording in clarification announcements can influence their effectiveness. Moreover, their relationship will be moderated simuhaneously by corporate reputation and media authority. When the corporate has bad reputation, or rumors are released from authoritative media, the denial wording shows stronger influence. The conclusions verify the effectiveness of psychology theories in stock market, and expand the scope of financial market research. In the mean time, the conclusions also provide new ideas for public companies to combat with rumors.
作者 张宁 刘春林
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期81-89,共9页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70872046 71072038) 山东省社科规划研究项目(09BJGJ44)
关键词 市场传闻 澄清效果 否认措辞 企业声誉 媒体权威性 market rumor clarification effectiveness denial wording corporate reputation media authority
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1DIFONZO N, BORDIA P. Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches [ M ]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,2007:90-102. 被引量:1
  • 2CLARKSON P M ,JOYCE D,TUTTICCI I. Market Reaction to Takeover Rumour in Internet Discussion Sites[ J]. Accounting & Finance ,2006,46( 1 ) :31-52. 被引量:1
  • 3ZIVNEY T L, BERTIN W J, TORABZADEH K M. Overreaction to Takeover Speculation [ J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 1996,36 ( 1 ) : 89-115. 被引量:1
  • 4LIU P, SMITH S D, SYED A A. Stock Price Reactions to The Wall Street Journal's Securities Recommendations[ J ]. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1990,25 ( 3 ) :399-410. 被引量:1
  • 5FREEDMAN A. Rumor Turns Fantasy into Bad Dream[ N ]. The Wall Street Journal, 1991-05-I0 (B1, B5 ). 被引量:1
  • 6TYBOUT A M, BOBBY J C,STERNTHAL B. Using Information Processing Theory to Design Marketing Strategies[ J ]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981,18 ( 1 ) :73-79. 被引量:1
  • 7DIFONZO N, BORDIA P, ROSNOW R L. Reining in Rumors[ J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1994,23 (1) :47-62. 被引量:1
  • 8EINWILLER S A,KAMINS M A. Rumor Has It:The Moderating Effect of Identification on Rumor Impact and the Effectiveness of Rumor Refutation [ J ]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008,58 ( 9 ) : 2248-2272. 被引量:1
  • 9BORDIA P, DIFONZO N, HAINES R, et al. Rumors Denials as Persuasive Messages:Effects of Personal Relevance, Source, and Message Characteristics [ J ]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2005,35 ( 6 ) : 1301 - 1331. 被引量:1
  • 10BORDIA P, DIFONZO N, SCHULZ C A. Source Characteristics in Denying Rumors of Organizational Closure : Honesty is the Best Policy [ J ]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2000,30 ( 11 ) : 2309-2321. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1余明桂,夏新平.控股股东、代理问题与关联交易:对中国上市公司的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(6):33-38. 被引量:208
  • 2叶勇,胡培,刘波.上市公司终极控制股东侵害度及实证研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2006,15(2):164-169. 被引量:11
  • 3杨兴君.2004.民营企业控制多家上市公司实证研究[R].深交所研究报告. 被引量:1
  • 4BEATTY R P, JAY R R. 1986. Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings[ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 15:213-232. 被引量:1
  • 5BENNEDSEN M, WOLFENZON D. 2001. The balance of power in closely held corporations [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 58:479 - 523. 被引量:1
  • 6CLAESSENS S S ,et al. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings [ J]. Journal of Finance, 57 (6) :2741 -2771. 被引量:1
  • 7CLIFFORD G H. 2001. A survey of blockholders and corporate control[R]. FRBNY Economic Policy Review. 被引量:1
  • 8EDWARDS J S,WEICHENRIEDER A J. 1999. Ownership concentration and share valuation: evidence from Germeny [ R]. Working Paper, Univ. of Cambridge : 82 - 85. 被引量:1
  • 9KARPOFF J,LOTT J J. 1993. The reputational penalty finns bear from committing criminal fraud[J], journal of Law and Economics, 36: 757 - 802. 被引量:1
  • 10LA PORTA R,LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F. 1998. Law and finance [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 11-13. 被引量:1

共引文献21

同被引文献87

引证文献6

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部