期刊文献+

宫颈癌根治性手术经腹腔镜与经腹两种途径对比分析 被引量:4

A Comparison between Laparoscopic and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomies for Cervical Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨经腹腔镜与经腹两种途径实施广泛性子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫术的安全性与有效性。[方法]对比分析83例经腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫术和同期374例经腹手术的患者临床资料。[结果]经腹腔镜组中转开腹率为1.20%。经腹腔镜组与经腹手术组比较平均手术时间长(293.43±77.53minvs200.33±42.79min,P<0.001),平均术中失血量少(213.01±120.33mlvs311.43±179.23ml,P<0.001),清扫淋巴结的个数无统计学差异。经腹腔镜较经腹手术组术后排气时间、术后住院时间明显短(P<0.05)。[结论]经腹腔镜实施广泛性子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫术安全,可以有效减少患者的术后恢复时间。
作者 汤巍巍 张新
机构地区 辽宁省肿瘤医院
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2012年第6期475-477,共3页 China Cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1黄新,李德川.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠恶性肿瘤的综合评价研究[J].中国肿瘤,2010,19(10):674-677. 被引量:4
  • 2Spirtos NM ,Eisenkop SM ,Schlaerth JB ,et al. Laparoscop-ie radical hysterectomy (type Ill) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical can- cer:surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up[J]. Am J Obstect Gynaecol, 2002,187(2):340-348. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen Y,Xu H,Li Y,et al. The outcome of laparoscopoc radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:a prospective analysis of 295 patients[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15(10):2847-2855. 被引量:1
  • 4Pellegrino A,Vizza E,Fruscio R,et al.Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in pa- tients with I bl stage cervical cancer:analysis of surgical and oncological outcome [J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2009,35 ( 1 ):98-103. 被引量:1
  • 5孟元光,李亚里,宋磊,彭红梅,李秀丽,李立安,黄柯,王玉峰.腹腔镜手术治疗40例宫颈癌患者的临床病例分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(13):764-766. 被引量:4
  • 6朱新贤,李怀芳,张弋,刘胜兰,童晓文.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫颈癌和内膜癌的对比分析[J].上海医学,2005,28(3):199-201. 被引量:10
  • 7Yan X, Li G,Shang H,et al. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy-experi- ence of 117 patients[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2009,19(5): 963-967. 被引量:1
  • 8Lee EJ,Kang H,Kim DH. A comparative study of laparo- scopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hys- terectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term fol- low-up study [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011, 156(1):83-86. 被引量:1
  • 9Yan X,Li G,Shang H,et al. Twelve-year experience with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lym- phadenectoray in cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2011, 120(3):362-367. 被引量:1
  • 10Sobiczewski P,Bidzinski M,Derlatka P,et al. Early cervi- cal cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery:comparison of treatment results [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009,19(8): 1390-1395. 被引量:1

二级参考文献46

  • 1Choh MS, Madura JA 2nd. The role of minimally invasive treatments in surgical oncology [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2009, 89(1):53-77, viii. 被引量:1
  • 2Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(13):144-150. 被引量:1
  • 3Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy [J]. Br J Surg, 1995, 82(3): 295-298. 被引量:1
  • 4Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliaui W, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(8):1180-1186. 被引量:1
  • 5Ma Y, Yang Z, Qin H, et al. A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer [J]. Med Oncol, 2010, [Epub ahead of print]. 被引量:1
  • 6COST Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for eolon cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(20):2050-2059. 被引量:1
  • 7Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246(4):655-664. 被引量:1
  • 8Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial [J]. Lancet Oncol,2005, 6(7):477-484. 被引量:1
  • 9Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLA- SICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472): 1718-1726. 被引量:1
  • 10Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopicassisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLA- SICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(21):3061-3068. 被引量:1

共引文献42

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部