摘要
朱熹的《二南》学术,在从经学迈向文学后,又从文学走向理学,是文学、理学二元一体的解释学。就文学的一元来说,朱熹认为《二南》诗篇是里巷歌谣,是低社会地位诗人抒情的咏叹,他还把自己认为是文学表现手法的赋、比、兴运用到解释中;就理学的一元来说,朱熹认为《二南》是文王王道政化后的诗篇,体现着文王王道新民之功的社会、人心、人外自然和谐及其三者之间的大和谐:家齐、国治、天下平、其民皡皡、庶类盛多。整体上看:作为诗歌,《二南》诗篇能指的多样性、意义的含混性,决定了朱熹关于他的文学、理学二元一体解释的合理性;二元的冲突也导致其解释上难以自圆其说的矛盾性,如《摽有梅》等表达男女情感之诗,就不是所谓的"中和"之音。
Zhu Xi＇s academic learning on Zhou Nan（周南 ） and Zhao Nan （召南） first experienced a tran- sition from learning of Confucian classics to literary learning, and then moved toward the learning of principle or reason, becoming a binary hermeneutics that combined literary learning with new-Confucianism. From the perspective of literary dimension, Zhu Xi maintained that belonged to the domain of folk lyrics and were nothing more Zhou Nan （周南 ） and Zhao Nan （召南）poetries than a solo vocal piece by which low-brow poets gave vent to their emotions. Zhu also applied such techniques of literary expression to his hermeneutics as Fu （a straightforward narrative with a beginning, middle, and conclusion, that stands by itself）, Bi Ca comparison or contrast, placing two things side by side） and Xing （a mental stimulation or ＂lightning＂ that pervades the mind of the reader）. From the perspective of neo-Confucianism, Zhu Xi argued that Zhou Nan （周南 ） and Zhao Nan （召南） poetries came as a result of Emperor Zhou Wenwang＇s enforcement of kingcraft politics, exhibiting a grand harmony between society, mankind and nature. When viewed as a whole, Zhou Nan （周南 ） and Zhao Nan （召南） poetries were subject to multiple interpretations, which supported Zhu Xi＇s binary hermeneutics that combined literary learning and new-Confucianism. However, the binary opposition also created inconsistencies in justifying his hermeneutics.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2012年第5期66-70,78,共6页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
基金
2011年度河南省青年骨干教师资助计划项目<朱熹〈诗经〉学的理学本体研究>(2011GGJS-166)
周口师院2010年度教改项目<地域文化与"中国文化概论课程">(J2010026)
关键词
朱熹
文学
理学
《二南》
解释学
Zhu Xi
literary learning
neo-Confucianism
Zhou Nan （周南 ） and Zhao Nan （召南）
Hermeneutics
