期刊文献+

不同施肥水平下桉树林木碳贮量的研究 被引量:6

Biomass carbon sequestration of individual Eucalypt under different fertilization levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在广西东门林场进行了桉树不同施肥水平下林木碳贮量研究,分析了不同施肥水平下桉树林分平均胸径、树高、单株生物量和碳贮量的差异特征。结果表明:6种施肥处理中最大施肥量的胸径、树高最大,最小施肥量的胸径、树高最小;在施肥总量相同的条件下,P含量比例高的林分胸径、树高平均值均大于P比例低的施肥处理;施肥对桉树林分生长的影响效果随着施肥后时间的延长而减弱;192月生时6种施肥处理下桉树林分平均单株碳贮量大小排序为处理3(81.37 kg)>处理1(80.22 kg)>处理5(79.65 kg)>处理4(78.07 kg)>处理2(77.86 kg)>处理6(76.21 kg);各器官碳贮量所占比例的大小排序均为树干(48.62%~48.95%)>树枝(17.20%~17.29%)>树根(16.15%~16.36%)>树叶(9.57%~9.67%)>树皮(8.05%~8.15%)。 The biomass carbon sequestration of individual Eucalypt tree under different fertilization levels were studied in Dongmen Forest Farm in Guangxi province, China. The difference features of DBH, mean height, mean individual tree biomass and carbon sequestration were analyzed. The results show that among the six fertilizer treatments, the tree with highest amount fertilizer had the biggest value of DBH and height growth, the tree with least amount fertilizer had the least value of DBH and height growth. Although the same amount fertilizer, the tree with higher content of P had bigger mean DBH value than the lower, and the effects of 6 fertilizer treatments decreased as the time passed. The mean individual tree carbon sequestration at 192 months under 6 fertilizer treatments showed an order from large to small as followings: treatment 3(81.37 kg)〉treatment 1(80.22 kg)〉treatment 5(79.65 kg)〉treatment 4(78.07 kg) 〉treatment 2(77.86 kg)〉treatment 6(76.21 kg). The rate of carbon sequestration for different parts of tree under 6 fertilizer treatments all showed an order as followings: stem (48.62%--48.95%)〉 branch (17.20%-17.29%)〉root(16.150/0-16.36%)〉 leaf (9.57%~9.67%)〉bark (8.05%-8.15%).
出处 《中南林业科技大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期97-101,共5页 Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
基金 林业重大公益性行业科研专项(201104003)"桉树生态经营及产业升级关键技术研究"
关键词 桉树 施肥水平 碳贮量 Eucalyptus fertilization levels carbon sequestration
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Caldeira K, Dully P B. The role of the southern ocean in uptake and storage of anthropogenic carbon dioxide[J]. Science,2000,287:620-622. 被引量:1
  • 2Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H, et al. Change in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001,292:2320-2322. 被引量:1
  • 3Malhi Y, Baldocchi D D, Jarvis P G. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1999,22:715 -740. 被引量:1
  • 4吴鹏飞,朱波,刘世荣,王小国.不同林龄桤-柏混交林生态系统的碳储量及其分配[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(7):1419-1424. 被引量:45
  • 5郭乐东,周毅,钟锡均,黎艳明,甘先华,张坤洪,李召青,梁远楠,辛凤坪,张卫强.西江流域桉树生态系统碳贮量与碳汇功能经济价值评价[J].广东林业科技,2009,25(6):8-13. 被引量:19
  • 6叶金盛,佘光辉.广东省森林植被碳储量动态研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(4):7-12. 被引量:54
  • 7张治军..广西造林再造林固碳成本效益研究[D].中国林业科学研究院,2009:
  • 8Laclau P. Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in northwest Patagonia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003,180:317-333. 被引量:1
  • 9Mendham D S, O'Connell A M, Grove T S. Change in soil Carbon after land cleating or afforestation in highly weathered lateritic and sandy soils of south-western Australia[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems ~ Environment,2003, 95(1): 143-156. 被引量:1
  • 10张小全,武曙红编著..中国CDM造林再造林项目指南[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006:293.

二级参考文献50

共引文献115

同被引文献249

引证文献6

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部