摘要
自第二次世界大战结束到20世纪70年代危机发生,是发达资本主义经济史上的黄金年代。西方马克思主义经济学对黄金年代的产生和延续提出了两种有代表性的解释,一种是曼德尔在《晚近资本主义》等论著中提出的解释,另一种则是调节学派的解释。曼德尔试图把资本主义生产方式的运动规律运用于解释战后繁荣,却未能在方法论上发展出一种为调节学派倡导的属于中间层次的制度分析。另一方面,调节学派虽然注重于制度分析,却不恰当地理解了资本主义生产方式的一般规律,误将消费作为积累的原动力。理论的进一步发展要求在两者之间达成某种创造性的综合。
The period from the end of World War Two to 1970's crisis was often considered to be the Golden Age of advanced capitalist economies.There were two different kinds of explanations up to now about the genesis and continuation of the Golden Age.One is that of Mandel in his master piece Late Capitalism,and the other is offered by the Regulation School.Applying the laws of motion of capitalist mode of production to explain the postwar boom,Mandel fails to develop an institutional analysis of intermediate level,which is advocated by the Regulation School.On the other hand,as a contribution in highlighting the importance of institutional analysis,the Regulation School misunderstands the general laws of motion of capitalist mode of production,particularly regarding consumption as the primary driving force for capital accumulation.The limitations of both Marxian explanations indicate that a creative combination of them is needed.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第5期35-46,159,共12页
Studies on Marxism
