期刊文献+

DTI在鉴别前列腺癌与前列腺增生中的价值 被引量:1

Value of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨扩散张量成像(DTI)在鉴别前列腺癌(PCa)与前列腺增生(BPH)中的价值。方法对疑似PCa或BPH的患者行常规磁共振检查及DTI检查,测量感兴趣区部分各向异性值(FA)及平均表观弥散系数值(ADC)并绘制DTI参数图及纤维示踪图。比较PCa与BPH组间FA值与ADC值的差别,并绘制ROC曲线,确定FA值及ADC值曲线下面积。结果 PCa与BPH的FA值分别为(0.36±0.05,0.28±0.06),两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积为0.82。PCa与BPH的ADC值分别为(1.10±0.27)×10-3 mm2/s,(1.55±0.32)×10-3mm2/s,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),ROC曲线下面积为0.85。结论 DTI能够反映PCa与BPH微观结构的不同,对鉴别PCa与BPH有一定的价值。 Objective To investigate the value of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiation between prostate cancer(PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging were performed in patients with suspected prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia,the fractional anisotropy(FA) and the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) values of the region of interest were measured,and the DTI parametric map and fiber tracking map were drawn.The differences of the FA and ADC values were analyzed using ROC curve plotting obtained the area under the ROC curve of the FA and ADC values.Results The FA values of the PCa and BPH were 0.36±0.05 and 0.28±0.06,and there was statistically difference between the two group(P0.05) with resulting the area under the ROC curve of 0.82.The ADC values of the PCa,BPH were 1.10±0.27×10-3mm2/s,1.55±0.32×10-3mm2/s,and there was statistically difference between the two group(P0.05) with resulting the area under the ROC curve of 0.85.Conclusion DTI can reflect the microscopic information differences between PCa and BPH.It appears to be value in differentiation between PCa and BPH.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2012年第3期482-485,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散张量成像 前列腺癌 前列腺增生 Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion tensor imaging Prostate cancer Benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1牛庆亮,王锡臻,王滨.MSCT多期增强扫描在良性前列腺增生和前列腺癌诊断及鉴别诊断中的价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(10):1019-1023. 被引量:2
  • 2Gurses B, Kabakci N, Kovanlikaya A, et aI. Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla [J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18: 716-721. 被引量:1
  • 3Gurses B, Tasdelen N, Yencilek F, et al. Diagnostic utility of DTIin prostate cancer[J]. EurJ Radiol, 2011,79: 172- 176. 被引量:1
  • 4Jolapara M, Kesavadas C, Radhakrishnan VV, et al. Diffu slon tensor mode in imaging of intracranial cpidermoid cysts: one step ahead of fractional anisotropy [J]. Neuroradiology,2009, 51: 123-129. 被引量:1
  • 5Jolapara M, Patro SN, Kesavadas C, et al. Can diffusion tensor metrics help in preoperative grading of diffusely infil trating astrocytomas? A retrospective study of 36 cases[J]. Neuroradiology, 2011, 53: 63-68. 被引量:1
  • 6de Carvalho Rangel C, Hygino Cruz LC Jr, Takayassu TC,et al. Diffusion MR imaging in central nervous system [J], Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2011, 19: 23-53. 被引量:1
  • 7Reischauer C, Wilm BJ, Froehlich JM, et al. High-resolu- tion diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer using a re duced FOV technique [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 80: 34-41. 被引量:1
  • 8Holodny AI, Gor DM, Watts R, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR tractography of somatotopic organizalion of corticospinal tracts in the internal capsule: initial anatomic results in con- tradistinction to prior reports [J]. Radiology, 2005, 234: 649-653. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

共引文献1

同被引文献31

  • 1张小马,梁朝朝.正常前列腺形态组织学及影像学研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):787-789. 被引量:8
  • 2史浩,丁红宇.弥散加权成像在前列腺癌诊断与鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):605-609. 被引量:13
  • 3杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:273. 被引量:56
  • 4Beppu T, lnoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Fractional anisotropy value hy diffusion tensor magnetic resoance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2005, 63(1 ): 56-61. 被引量:1
  • 5Jolapara M, Patro SN, Kesavadas C, et al. Can diffusion tensor metrics help in preoperative grading of diffusely infiltrating astro- eytomas? A retrospective study of 36 cases [ J]. Neuroradiology, 2011, 53(1): 63-68. 被引量:1
  • 6de Carvalho Rangel C, Hygino Cruz LC Jr, Takayassu TC, et al. Diffusion MR imaging in central nervous system [ J]. Magn Reson hnaging Clin N Am, 2011, 19( 1 ) : 23-53. 被引量:1
  • 7Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate caneer [ J] . J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29(2) : 149-153. 被引量:1
  • 8Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in pe- ripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quanti- tative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR1, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T [J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(2) : 239-247. 被引量:1
  • 9lwazawa J, Mitani T, Sassa S, et al. Prostate cancer detection with MRI : is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in ad- dition to diffusion-weighted imaging? [ J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2011 , 17(3) : 243-248. 被引量:1
  • 10Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, et al. Diffusion-weighted and dynam- ic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quan- titative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis [J]. AJR, 2011, 197(6): 1382-1390. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部