期刊文献+

“疑罪从无”原则的西法渊源 被引量:1

The Origin of Principle of "No Punishment in Doubtful Crime" in Western Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 疑罪从无是处理罪与非罪类疑罪案件应坚持的原则,在英美法系和大陆法系的许多国家已得到了很好的运用。从罗马法探寻疑罪从无原则的渊源,发现有""嫌疑不得判处"、"有疑,为被告人之利益"等原则,是为疑罪从无原则的雏形。另外,从罗马法中还可探寻到无罪推定、正当诉讼程序和合理的证据制度、较完备的辩护制度、限制国家公权力等相关制度和原则以及保障人权和人道主义思想。罗马法启迪我们要贯彻落实疑罪从无原则,并有效确立无罪推定原则、辩护制度、人道主义思想等,努力使刑法理性回归,更加注重人权保障。 "No punishment in doubtful crime" is a principle in doubtful cases, in which it is not clear that defendants are guilty. The principle has been well established both in the systems of common law and continental law. In Roman law, this principle is original from the statements of the suspected cant be convicted guilty and the benefit of doubtfulness belongs to the defendant. Apart from this, some other thinking can also be found from Roman law, which includes the principle of presumption of innocence, proper proceedings, reasonable evidence system, relatively completed adversarial system, the principle of restraining public power, the thoughts of human- ism and human rights protection. Roman law inspires us to keep the principle of no punishment in doubtful crime, the principle of pre- sumption of innocence, adversarial system, humanism, which emphasize rationality in criminal law and human rights protection.
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期42-45,共4页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 疑罪从无原则 西法渊源 罗马法 嫌疑不得判处 principle of "no punishment in doubtful crime" origin of western law Roman law the suspected can' t be convicted guilty
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1[意]贝卡利亚.《论犯罪与刑罚》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1993年版.第59页. 被引量:149
  • 2[英]洛克:《政府论(下篇)》,叶启芳、瞿菊农译,商务印书馆1997年版,第98—104页 被引量:3
  • 3Ernest van den Haag and John P. Conrad, The Death Penalty: A Debate, New York and London:Plenum Press, 1983, p. 164. 被引量:1
  • 4Hugo Adam Bedau, Death Is Different : Studies in the Morality, Law and Politics of Capital Punishment,Boston : Northeastern University Press, 1987, p. 103. 被引量:1
  • 5Ernest van den Haag and John P. Conrad,The Death Penalty:A Debate,New York and London:Plenum Press, 1983, p. 157. 被引量:1
  • 6Hugo Adam Bedau,Death Is Different: Studies in the Morality, Law and Politics of Capital Punishment,Boston : Northeastern University Press, 1987, p. 92. 被引量:1
  • 7Anmesty International USA,When the State Kills…The death penalty: a human rights issue, 1989,p. 2 被引量:1
  • 8联合国经济与社会理事会秘书长.《关于死刑的贯彻(保证面对死刑的人的权利的保护的保障措施)的报告》(第六个五年报告第67段). 被引量:1
  • 9Hugo Adam Bedau, Death Is Different: Studies in the Morality, Law and Politics of Capital Punishment,Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987, p. 10. 被引量:1
  • 10[日]团藤重光.《死刑废止论》.有斐阁,1992年版.第136、95页. 被引量:1

共引文献52

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部