摘要
一般情况下履行和解不具有独立性与可诉性,因其表现形式不同,性质认定上及效力上有差别:对于没有约定诉讼权利义务的履行和解,只有实际履行才能产生对抗执行与消灭实际权利义务的法律效力;对于约定诉讼权利义务的履行和解,其从本质上属诉讼契约。对于此类履行和解,若一方违反程序性约定,启动或放弃某项诉讼程序,应首先审查双方关于实体部分之合意是否切实履行,若已履行,应认定该行为不合法而否决其效力;若并未合理履行,则该违反程序约定之行为并非无效。
Generally speaking, to fulfill reconciliation does not have independence tations and natures are different. To fulfill reconciliation, if without agreement on tion, only when the fulfillment actually happens, otherwise, it will not produce any ment, reconciliation fulfillment, by nature, is litigation contract. If one party is in initiating or givi earnestly fulfille ng up a procedure, d. If fulfilled, the ju the court shall firstly review whether the conve dicial act shall not be valid and effective, or el justiciability, whose manifes- right and obligation of litigalegal effect. If there is an agree- breach of procedural agreement, ntion of substantial part has been se it does not act invalid.
出处
《常熟理工学院学报》
2012年第3期69-72,84,共5页
Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology
关键词
履行和解
执行和解
诉讼契约
法律效力
fulfill reconciliation
enforce the compromise
litigation contract
legal effect
