摘要
逻辑学东渐,启发了梁启超的中国传统学术研究;用西方传统逻辑研究墨家逻辑形成了梁启超研究范式,并影响着中国逻辑史的百年研究。在对其研究范式的肯定与否定的争论中,形成了三种主要立场:中国形式逻辑史、中国名学与辩学史、中国符号学史。我们认为,逻辑观的问题是解决中国逻辑史界论争的关键。
In this paper we will investigate, from a historical point of view, a research paradigm in the study of history of logic in China. It is firstly put forward by Liang Qichao, and is well embodied in his studies of Mohist Logic with a comparative framework of western tradi- tional logic. This paradigm has greatly influenced our study of history of logic in China for the following hundred years. Within the disputes on this paradigm, scholars have developed three different positions on Chinese Logic： Chinese Logic as Formal Logic in China, Chinese Logic as Mingxue and Bianxue, and Chinese Logic as Semiotics. We argue that none of them has completely broken away from Liang Qichao＇s research paradigm, and that in order to resolve the current controversy on Chinese Logic we will need to reform our general view of logic.
出处
《逻辑学研究》
CSSCI
2012年第1期113-125,共13页
Studies in Logic
基金
supported by the Chinese MOE Project of Humanities and Social Sciences,“The Study of Gongsunlongzi and Mobian from the Perspective of General Argumentation”(10YJA72040001)
