期刊文献+

高原肺水肿患者血清胰岛素样生长因子─Ⅱ水平的变化 被引量:1

Changes of Insulin-like growth factor-Ⅱlevel in patients with high altitude pulmonary edema
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨高原肺水肿(HAPE)患者血清胰岛素样生长因子-Ⅱ(IGF-Ⅱ)水平的变化。方法:采用放射免疫分析法在海拔3700m对8例HAPE患者治疗前和临床治愈后检测血清IGF-Ⅱ水平。结果:HAPE患者治疗前为9.732.00μg/L临床治愈后为6.09。1.46μg/L),差异非常显著(P<0.001)。结论:IGF-Ⅱ参与了HAPE的发生发展过程。 To study changes of Insulin - like growth factor - Ⅱ (IGF - Ⅱl ) level in patients with high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE).Method: The level of IGF - Ⅱ were measured in 8 HAPE patients pre - and post - treatment at 3700m altitude by radio - immunity analysis. Result:The level of IGF - Ⅱ were significantly increased (P < 0.001 ) before treatment compared with post - treatment. Conclusion: The increased serum IGF - Ⅱ may participate in the occurance and development of HAPE.
出处 《西藏医药》 2000年第2期3-4,共2页 Tibetan Medicine
基金 军队"九五"高原医学攻关课题
关键词 高原肺水肿 免疫 IGF-Ⅱ High altitude, pulmonary edema,Insulin-like growth factor-Ⅱ
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1DRIVER R, NEWTON P, OSBORNE J. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms [J]. Science F_xtucation, 2000, 84; 287-312. 被引量:1
  • 2ERDURAN S, SIMON S, OSBORNE J. TAPping into Argumentation; Developments in the Application of Toulmn's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse [J]. Science Education, 2004, 88: 915-933. 被引量:1
  • 3S ERDURAN, M P JZ-ALEIXANDRK Argu- mentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Class- room-based Research [C]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 4M S KHINE. Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research [C]. Dordrecht; Springer, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 5. KELLY G J, TAKAO A. Epistemic Levels in Argu- ment; An Analysis of University Oceanography Students Use of Evidence in Writing [J]. Science Education, 2002, 86.. 314-342. 被引量:1
  • 6SAMPSON V, ENDERLE P J, WALKER J P. The Development and Validation of the Assessment of Scientific Argumentation in the Classroom (ASAC) Observa-tion Protocol.. A Tool for Evaluating How Students Participate in Scientific Argumentation [A] //KHINE M S. Perspectives on Scientific Argu- mentation: Theory, Practice and Research [(2]. Dor- drecht: Springer, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 7LEE H S, LIIU O L, PALLANT A, ROOHR K C, PRYPUTNIEWICZ S, BUCK Z E. Assessment of Uncertainty-infused Scientific Argumentation [ J ]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2014, 51 (5) 581-605. 被引量:1
  • 8MCNEILL K L. Elementary Students' Views of Ex- planation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments Over the School Year [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48 (7): 793-823. 被引量:1
  • 9TOULMIN S. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1958. 被引量:1
  • 10JIMtNEZ-ALE1XANDRE M P, ERDURAN S. Ar- gumentation in Science Education: An Overview [A] //S ERDURAN, M P JIMtNEZ-ALEIXAN- DRE. Argumentation in Science Education: Perspec- tives from Classroom-based Research [C]. Dor- drecht: Springer, 2007. 被引量:1

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部