摘要
目的:比对分析CT与超声在诊断急性坏死型胰腺炎的临床价值。方法:将在笔者所在医院进行手术治疗的45例急性重症胰腺炎患者的CT和超声诊断与手术病理诊断进行对照,分析比较CT与超声诊断急性坏死型胰腺炎时的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和预测精确性等临床价值。结果:CT检查结果在敏感性、阴性预测值、预测精确性方面明显优于超声检查,差异明显,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在特异性和阳性预测值方面有差异但不明显,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CT与超声诊断急性坏死型胰腺炎都存在临床价值,但是CT在敏感性、阴性预测值、预测精确性优于超声检查。
Objective：To compare and analyze the clinical value of CT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis（ANP）.Methods：The 45 cases of severe acute pancreatitis patients with CT and ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology diagnosis in author＇s hospital were compared,and the clinical value of the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,Yin-shaped forecast value and forecast accuracy of CT and ultrasound diagnosis of ANP was analyzed.Results：The CT results of sensitivity,negative predictive,forecasting accuracy were significantly better than ultrasound,and with obvious difference.There was statistically significant（P0.05）.There were differences in the specificity and positive predictive value but without obvious,there was not statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion：There is clinical value for CT and ultrasound diagnosis of ANP.The CT in the sensitivity,negative predictive value,the prediction accuracy are better than ultrasound.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2012年第13期47-48,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
急性坏死型胰腺炎
CT
超声
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis
CT
Ultrasound
