摘要
费孝通一生的学术旨趣便是社区研究。针对同行对《江村经济》这种由点及面的演绎、推理方法有以偏概全的责难,费孝通主张社区研究视角应该比较更加广阔性地不同的社会地域提供的条件和结构,而不应该限制在单一个案之中。由此,从"江村"研究再到"云南三村",体现了费孝通早年试图通过社区研究到类型比较模式再到"文化格式",从而认识整个中国社会结构的抱负。这其中,《云南三村》构成费孝通20世纪40年代应用类型比较方法的典范,并值得当代每一个社会科学工作者的学习和反思。
Xiaotong Fei＇s academic life is the purport of community studies.For peer-on ＂Peasant Life＂ this from the point and the surface of the deduction,reasoning methods are sweeping censure,Fei advocated community-based research should compare the broader perspective of the different regions to provide the social conditions and structures,and should not be limited to a single case among the.Thus,from the ＂Village＂ research to the ＂three villages in Yunnan＂,reflects an attempt by Fei early type of community studies to compare mode to the ＂cultural form＂,thus recognizing the aspirations of the whole structure of Chinese society.Among these,the ＂three villages in Yunnan,＂ Fei Xiaotong in the 1940s constitutes the application example of the type of comparison method,and is worth every contemporary social scientists to study and reflection.
出处
《社会工作》
2012年第3期59-62,共4页
Journal of Social Work
关键词
费孝通
云南三村
社区研究
类型比较
Xiaotong Fei
Yunnan Three Villages
Community Studies
Type Comparison
