期刊文献+

骨种植钉前牵引对骨性Ⅲ类错患者软硬组织侧貌的影响 被引量:13

Soft and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究采用骨种植钉前牵引对骨性Ⅲ类错患者软、硬组织侧貌的改变。方法选取18例需行前牵引矫治的生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类错患者,采用双侧上颌颧牙槽嵴植入骨种植钉配合面框式前牵引,平均治疗时间为9个月,力值为(3.5±0.1)N。治疗前后头影测量采用Legan&Burstone软组织分析法以及相关硬组织测量,分析比较患者治疗前后软、硬组织变化情况。结果所有患者Ⅲ类错均得到改善,鼻底趋于丰满,颏部顺时针旋转,侧貌由凹面型变为直面型,下唇突度减小,软组织上下面高比、鼻唇角、上唇突度及颏唇沟深度无明显变化。上前牙无明显变化,下前牙舌倾,上颌骨向前生长,A点前移,SNA、ANB增大;SNB减小,下颌骨顺时针旋转。结论骨种植钉前牵引可促进上颌生长,使面中份丰满,且对上颌前牙轴倾度无影响,从而纠正骨性Ⅲ类错。 Objective To evaluate the soft profile and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion during growth period.Methods 18 patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion were treated with maxillary protraction for about 9 months,(3.5±0.1) N,with skeletal anchorage im-plant and face mask.Cephalometric records were analyzed to assess the changes of maxillo-facial structure of the hard and soft tissue before and after treatment.Results All patients' Class Ⅲ profiles were corrected.Maxillary growth increased,chin clockwise rotated,facial convexity angle increased,lower lip protrusion decreased.Facial vertical height ratio,nasolabial angle,upper lip protrusion and mentolabial sulcus changed unconspicuously.Upper incisors kept in sites,lower incisor upright,maxilla moved forwards.SNA,ANB significantly increased.SNB decreased and the mandible clockwise rotated.Conclusion The maxilla is effectively protracted without significant rotation by using skeletal an-chorage implant.The undesired effects of conventional protraction therapies,such as labial tilt of upper anterior teeth and extrusion of the maxillary molars,are reduced or eliminated with skeletal anchorage implant.These effects can con-spicuously correct profiles of the patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion,make the profile more harmonious and aesthetic.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期278-282,共5页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 深圳市科技计划基金资助项目(医疗卫生类 201103144)
关键词 骨种植钉 骨性Ⅲ类错 前牵引 面部软组织改变 skeletal anchorage implant skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion protraction facial soft profile changes
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Liou EJ. Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class Ⅲ patients: A clinical application simulates distraction os- teogenesis[J]. Prog Orthod, 2005, 6(2):154-171. 被引量:1
  • 2赵志河,白丁.正畸治疗方案设计[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.6. 被引量:3
  • 3刘红,段银钟,陈巧玲,毕惠贤,杨振华,王海雪.改良固定反式TBA联合前牵矫治前牙反[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(3):378-381. 被引量:25
  • 4Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A, et al. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces[J/OL]. Eur J Or- thod. [2011-01-27]. http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/01/ 27/ejo.cjq165.full. 被引量:1
  • 5Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I. Effects of treatment with a com- bined maxillary protraction and chineap appliance in skeletal Class m patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2007, 29 (2) : 126-133. 被引量:1
  • 6Ahug Z, Arslan AD. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxil- lary protraction appliance[J]. Angle Orthod, 2006, 76(3):360-368. 被引量:1
  • 7Sar C, Arman-0zcrplm A, Uckan S, et al. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 139(5):636-649. 被引量:1
  • 8Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140 (6) : 790-798. 被引量:1
  • 9Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO. Midfacial protraction with skeletally an- chored face mask therapy: A novel approach and preliminary re- suits[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(3):440-449. 被引量:1
  • 10周彦恒,丁鹏,林野,邱立新.钛板种植体上颌前方牵引治疗的初步应用研究[J].口腔正畸学,2007,14(3):102-105. 被引量:21

二级参考文献17

  • 1徐宝华,林久祥.前方牵引器治疗骨性前牙反的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2001,36(6):4-6. 被引量:75
  • 2赵美英 罗颂椒 陈杨熙.牙颌面畸形功能矫形[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.168. 被引量:1
  • 3Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopedic treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion. Eur J Orthod, 1997,19: 289-311. 被引量:1
  • 4Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, et al. Timing for effective appliance of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1997, 112:292-299. 被引量:1
  • 5Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class Ⅲ patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: A longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2000, 117:669-680. 被引量:1
  • 6Irie M, Nakamura S. Orthopedic approach to severe skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion. Am J Orthod, 1977, 67:377-392. 被引量:1
  • 7da Silva FOG, Magro AC, Capelozza FL. Early treatmrnt of the class Ⅲ malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1998, 113: 196-203. 被引量:1
  • 8Kokich, Shapiro, Oswald, et al. Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report. Am J Orthod, 1985, 88 : 303- 307. 被引量:1
  • 9Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod, 1988, 94: 285-295. 被引量:1
  • 10Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod, 2000,70 : 253- 262. 被引量:1

共引文献87

同被引文献119

引证文献13

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部