摘要
文本表达与司法实践背离的问题自古有之,直到今天仍然困扰着我们。传统法比附援引在弥合法律文本与司法实践的缝隙方面发挥了至关重要的作用,与缘法定罪之间存在一定的张力,二者共同保证了司法结论的合法性与正当性。如何约束司法者比附的恣意性,是比附援引能够发挥应有作用的前提保证。探究比附援引的源与流对当下罪刑法定下如何把握扩张性解释的度具有一定的启发意义。
The problem of the lap between text expression and judicial practice existed in ancient society, but still confuses us today. Analogy in traditional law played an important role in closing the lap between text expression and judicial practice. There was a tension between analogy and conviction according to the law, which both guaran- teed legality and legitimacy of judicial conclusion. How to constrain the judiciary arbitrarily judging was the premise which made analogy play an important role. Exploring the origin of analogy has some inspiration to how to grasp the limitation of the interpretation of expansion under the principle of legality today.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第5期40-44,共5页
Law Science Magazine
基金
2011年山东省社会科学规划重点研究项目"传统法比附援引与缘法定罪之间的张力"(项目编号:11BFXJ04)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
比附援引
缘法定罪
扩张解释
罪刑法定
analogy conviction according to the law the interpretation of expansion the principle of legality
