摘要
目的观察低位肛瘘手术治疗方法和疗效及安全性。方法选择2009年10月～2010年5月治疗的67例确诊为低位肛瘘的患者,分为对照组和手术组,对照组行常规切开引流术,手术组行切开缝合术。比较两组手术治疗效果和安全性。结果手术组的临床疗效更好,切口愈合时间更短,复发率更低,不良反应发生次数更少且差异有统计学意义。结论低位肛瘘行切开缝合术有良好的临床疗效和安全性。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the treatment of anal fistula surgery.Methods 67 patients in our hospital from Oct,2009 to May,2010 with low anal fistula were randomly divided into two groups,the control group including 33 treated with conventional methods,and the treatment group including 34 treated by excision suture,incision and drainage.Results The cure rate of the treatment group was better than the control group,and the average heakiing time was shorter as well as the incidence rate of adverse reactions was less and the difference between the two groups was signigicant（P0.05）.Conclusion The suture removal is a effective way to treat the low anal fistula,and can reduce the adverse reactions and the protection o anal physilolgical function.
出处
《当代医学》
2012年第14期108-109,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
低位肛瘘
切开引流术
Low anal fistula
Low-cut suture removal
