摘要
自20世纪60年代以来,诠释学已成为这个时代哲学的"共通语"。能否借鉴西方诠释学成果或者透过其理论视域来思考经学的有关问题,是一个颇具意义的话题。然而,自"诠释学"正式进入中国(大陆)以来,操用诠释学的术语和理论来谈论中国学术问题的学者尚未真正抓住诠释学的主题,造成这种"误读"的原因,主要在于对诠释学的存在论内涵的忽视。我们无法仅从经学本身所必定包含的文本理解与解释的因素就简单地判定经学是一门诠释学,而是应该紧紧把握诠释学所展开的"对历史学的客观主义和实证主义的物理主义认识理想"的批判来看待经学研究本身的问题。我们认为,是否立足于"一种对方法论合理性的遗弃",是经学诠释学是否可能的理论基点。
It is hermeneutics that turns to be the kine of the philosophy of our times since 1960s of last century.Whether the achievement in the field of hermeneutics can be borrowed or referenced to study on Confucian classics('Jingxue') becomes a significant topic.However,since hermeneutics is introduced into China,many Chinese scholars who try to use hermeneutical terms and theory on Chinese academic study haven't really grasped the key points of it.The misunderstanding comes from the ignorance of its ontological meaning.We cannot call the study of Confucian classics hermeneutics just because the study itself includes the elements of text comprehension and interpretation.Instead,the dialectical critique of hermeneutics based on physicalistic recognition of objectivism and positivism in history should be used for the study of Confucian classics.Whether the study of Confucian classics can be called hermeneutics is based on the reasonable abandons of methodological idea.
出处
《东疆学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期31-38,111,共8页
Dongjiang Journal
基金
2007-2010复旦大学文史研究院课题项目"比较诗学:经学与中国解释学思想的现代研究"
项目批准号:EYH3801023
关键词
诠释学
经学
经
章太炎
hermeneutics,study of Confucian classics(Jingxue),Zhang taiyan
