期刊文献+

临床血脂检验报告单改革对相关科室医生调脂治疗知识和行为的影响效果评价 被引量:7

Short-term impact of modified blood-lipid reports on physicians' lipid lowering drug prescribing behavior and knowledge improvement on dyslipidemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的试点改革血脂检查报告单的报告方式,并评价此项改革对相关科室医生调脂治疗知识和行为的影响。方法采取自身前后对照的实验研究,以问卷调查形式,在报告单改革前后对中日友好医院调脂治疗相关科室医生(143人)进行普查,闭卷考核其对指南相关知识的掌握程度,同时了解医生对报告单有用性的评价。对相应的门诊患者进行抽样调查,了解医生处方率变化情况。结果报告单改革后,医务人员对《中国成人血脂异常防治指南》(简称指南)的认知率从67.1%(96/143)提高到83.9%(120/143)(P〈0.001),指南知识相关题目回答正确均值从9.62±3.29提高到12.88±3.79(P〈0.001)。改革前后均参与评价指南有用性的77名医生中,认为指南对工作有很大帮助的医生从55.8%(43/77)上升到75.3%(58/77)(P=0.005)。95.5%的医生认为改革后的报告单优于改革前。但报告单改革前后调脂治疗药物处方率变化差异无统计学意义(63.2%比69.2%,P=0.117)。结论血脂检验报告单的改革,提高了医生对指南的认知和掌握程度,但医生总体处方率无明显变化。应尝试将这项改革推广,以期进一步提高临床调脂治疗达标率。 Objective To compare the physicians' lipid lowering drug prescribing behavior and knowledge on dyslipidemia before and at 8 months after new-issued blood-lipid reports in our hospital. Method Blood-lipid reports in our hospital is newly modified in that the classification of dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering guideline and target lipid level are listed on the back of lipid report besides the normal lipid value listed immediately after the measured lipid levels. Physicians' lipid lowering drug prescribing behavior and knowledge on dyslipidemia before and at 8 months after new-issued blood-lipid reports were examined in 143 doctors from various departments before and at 8 months after new-issued lipid reports. Results At 8 months after the new issued lipid reports, doctors' cognition rate about the guideline was significantly increased [ 83.9% ( 120/143 ) vs. 67.1% (96/143) , P 〈 0. 001 ] and the guideline was considered more helpful on daily practice [75.3% (58/77) vs. 55.8% (43/77), P =0. 005] compared to baseline. However, the prescription rate of dyslipidemia therapy did not change significantly (69.2% vs. 63.2% , P = 0. 117 ) at 8 months after the new issued lipid reports. Conclusions The modification of the blood-lipid reports improved doctors' knowledge on dyslipidemia and on the " Chinese guidelines on prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults". However, the lipid lowering drug prescribing behavior remained unchanged at 8 months after the modification of the lipid reports. Further investigation is warranted to see if the lipid lowering drug prescribing behavior could be changed in the long-term.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期318-322,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 血脂异常 诊断 指南 药物疗法 Dyslipidemias Diagnosis Guideline Drug therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献197

共引文献5380

同被引文献45

  • 1鄢盛恺,陈文祥.临床血脂测定的方法学与标准化进展[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(11):1050-1053. 被引量:10
  • 2中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5233
  • 3The Collaborative Research Group for the Second Multi-center Survey of Clinical Management of Dyslipidemia in China.第二次中国临床血脂控制达标率及影响因素多中心协作研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):420-427. 被引量:126
  • 4Ensign W, Hill N, Heward CB. Disparate LDL phenotypie classifi- cation among 4 different methods assessing LDL particle characteris- tics[J]. Clin Chem, 2006,52(9) :1722-1727. 被引量:1
  • 5Hirano T, ho Y, Yoshino G. Measurement of small dense low-densi- ty lipoprotein particles [ J ]. J Atheroseler Thromb, 2005, 12 (2) : 67-72. 被引量:1
  • 6Ito Y, Fujimura M, Ohta M, et al. Development of a homogeneous assay for t of small dense LDL cholesterol [ J ]. Clin Chem, 2011, 57(1):57-65. 被引量:1
  • 7Mallol R, Rodriguez MA, Heras M, et al. Particle size measurement of lipoprotein fractions using diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy [J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2012, 402(7) :2407-2415. 被引量:1
  • 8Cromwell WC, Otvos JD, Keyes MJ, et al. LDL particle number andrisk of future cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study-implications for LDL management [ J ]. J Clin Lipidology, 2007, 1 (6) :583-592. 被引量:1
  • 9Otvos JD, Mora S, Shalaurova I, et al. Clinical implications of dis- cordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and particle number[J].J Clin Lipidology, 2011, 5(2) :105-113. 被引量:1
  • 10Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furberg CD, et al. Lipoprotein manage- ment in patients with cardiometabolic risk : consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Car- diology Foundation [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2008,31 (4) : 811-822. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部