期刊文献+

N式砌块配筋砌体剪力墙抗震性能试验研究 被引量:3

Experimental study on seismic behavior of N-type block reinforced masonry shear walls
原文传递
导出
摘要 对4片配筋率相同但灌孔率和砌筑方法(错缝砌筑和同缝砌筑)不同的N式砌块配筋砌体剪力墙进行了低周反复荷载试验,研究了墙体的破坏模式、承载力、滞回特性、延性等抗震性能指标。试验结果表明:相比于普通混凝土小砌块砌体配筋墙体,错缝砌筑和同缝砌筑的N式砌块配筋砌体剪力墙都表现出更高的斜截面承载力,且砌块剪力墙的破坏形态与现浇钢筋混凝土剪力墙相似,破坏时受拉纵筋屈服,角部砌块与灌孔混凝土压碎;墙体的承载力随着竖向荷载的降低而降低,但墙体的延性随着竖向荷载的降低而增大;墙体发生受弯破坏时,裂缝细而多,破坏时裂而不倒,具有良好的承载能力、刚度、延性性能以及耗能能力;墙体抗震性能明显优于普通砌块配筋砌体剪力墙。 Four pieces of N-type block reinforced masonry shear walls,which were built differently(built in normal ways or built with straight-lint joint)with the same reinforcement ratio but different grouting ratio,were tested in the low reversed cyclic loading test,and the failure modes,ultimate bearing capacity,hysteretic characteristics and ductility of the walls were studied and analyzed.The results of the test showed that N-type block reinforced masonry shear walls had a higher shear ultimate bearing capacity regardless of the different building methods.And the failure modes of the walls were similar with that of the reinforced concrete shear walls,whose longitudinal tensile reinforcement yielded and corner blocks and grouted concrete crushed when failure.Besides,with the reduction of the vertical load,the bearing capacity of the walls decreased,while the ductility of them increased.It can be concluded that the walls have good strength,stiffness,ductility and energy dissipation capacity as they were failed in bending with many thin cracks developed,and therefore,the seismic behavior of N-type block reinforced masonry shear walls is better than that of the ordinary reinforced masonry shear walls.
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期128-136,共9页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50808074) 教育部创新团队项目(IRT0917)
关键词 配筋砌体 剪力墙 同缝砌筑 错缝砌筑 拟静力试验 抗震性能 reinforced masonry shear wall built with straight-lint joint built in normal ways quasi-static test seismic behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Priestley M J N.Seismic design of concrete masonryshear walls[J].ACI Journal,1986,83(8):58-67. 被引量:1
  • 2Shing P B,Noland J L,Klamerus E,et al.Inelasticbehavior of concrete masonry shear wall[J].Journal ofStructural Engineering,ASCE,1989,115(9):2204-2225. 被引量:1
  • 3Shing P B,Schuller M,Hoskere V S.In-planeresistance of reinforced masonry shear wall[J].Journalof Structural Engineering,ASCE,1990,116(3):619-640. 被引量:1
  • 4Shing P B,Schuller M,Hoskere V S,et al.Flexuraland shear response of reinforced masonry wall[J].ACIJournal,1990,87(6):646-656. 被引量:1
  • 5Haluk S,Hugh D M.Seismic shear capacity ofreinforced masonry piers[J].Journal of StructuralEngineering,ASCE,1991,117(7):2166-2186. 被引量:1
  • 6Tomazevic M,Lutman M,Petkovic L.Seismic behaviorof masonry walls experimental simulation[J].Journal ofStructural Engineering,ASCE,1996,122(9):1040-1047. 被引量:1
  • 7Shedid M T,Hamid A A,Drysdale R G.Ductility ofreinforced masonry shear walls and impact of incompletegrouting[C]//Proceedings of 10th Canadian MasonrySymposium.Banff,Alberta:University of Calgary.Department of Civil Engineering,2005. 被引量:1
  • 8Peter T L,Jason M I.Structural testing of large-scalepost tensioned concrete masonry walls[J].Journal ofStructural Engineering,ASCE,2004,130(10):1497-1505. 被引量:1
  • 9Ganesan T P,Ramamurthy K.Behavior of concretehollow-block masonry prisms under axial compression[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,1992,118(7):1751-1769. 被引量:1
  • 10Ramamurthy K,Sathish V,Ambalavanan R.Compressive strength prediction of hollow concrete blockmasonry prisms[J].ACI Journal,2000,97(1):61-66. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部