期刊文献+

对比分析超声造影及增强CT诊断小肾癌 被引量:9

Comparative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较CEUS及增强CT(CECT)对小肾癌(SRCC)的诊断价值。方法对132例患者进行实时CEUS及CECT检查,以手术和穿刺病理结果为标准比较两种检查方法对SRCC的诊断价值。结果 132例患者中,恶性肿瘤119例(透明细胞癌95例,嫌色细胞癌9例,乳头状细胞癌13例,肾囊性细胞癌2例),良性肿瘤13例(均为肾错构瘤)。CEUS图像显示SRCC多呈富血供表现,有假包膜者占76.47%(91/119)。时间-强度曲线显示SRCC病灶的造影剂到达时间及曲线达峰时间低于肾皮质(P<0.05),达峰绝对值高于周围肾皮质(P<0.05)。CEUS确诊肾恶性肿瘤114例,误诊5例,确诊良性肿瘤6例,误诊7例。CECT确诊肾恶性肿瘤102例,误诊13例,漏诊4例,确诊良性病变6例,误诊7例。两种方法在SRCC的诊断方面差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.74,P>0.05)。结论 CEUS与CECT对诊断SRCC可起到相互补充的作用。通过TIC分析,CEUS可定量分析SRCC的血流灌注特点,诊断SRCC更为准确、客观。 Objective To compare the value of CEUS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma (SRCC). Methods Totally 132 patients with small renal tumors were examinated using CEUS and CECT respectively. Taking operation and pathology results as golden standards, the diagnostic value of SRCC with the two methods was compared. Results There were 119 patients with SRCC, including 95 clear cell carcinoma, 9 chromophobic cell renal carcinoma, 13 papillary cell carcinoma and 2 cystic renal cell carcinoma cases. Hamartoma was detected in 13 patients. Most of SRCC had rich blood supply, and pseudocapsule was found in 91 cases (91/119, 76.47%) by CEUS. Time-intensity curve showed the arrival time and the time to peak of SRCC were lower than those of the renal cortex (P〈 0.05), and peak intensity was higher than that of the surrounding renal cortex (P〈0.05). Correct diagnosis was obtained in 114 cases with SRCC and 6 cases with hamartoma using CEUS, while 102 SRCC and 6 hamartoma using CECT. CEUS misdiagnosed 5 cases of SRCC and ? cases of hamartoma, while CECT misdiagnosed 13 cases of SRCC and 7 cases of hamartoma, and missed 4 cases of SRCC. No statistical difference was found between CEUS and CECT in differentiating of SRCC (x^2 =2.74, P〉0. 05). Conclusion CEUS and CECT complement each other in the diagnosis of SRCC. Through analyzing perfusion characteristics of SRCC quantitatively with TIC, CEUS can diagnose SRCC accurately and objectively.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期760-764,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(30970835)
关键词 肾细胞 造影剂 超声检查 体层摄影术 X线计算机 诊断显像 Carcinoma, renal cell Contrast media Ultrasonography Tomography, X-ray computed Diagnostic imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

共引文献87

同被引文献64

  • 1张雨,马亚凌,娜迪热·铁列吾汗.超声对肾癌筛查的诊断价值及漏误诊分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(4):290-291. 被引量:4
  • 2杜联芳,李凡,姜露莹,许小云,路光中.超声造影在肾占位性病变中的应用[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(11):813-815. 被引量:69
  • 3Penny Whiting,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick MM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,刁骧(译),艾昌林(译),秦莉(审校),姚巡(审校).QUADAS的制定:用于系统评价中评价诊断性研究质量的工具[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):296-306. 被引量:68
  • 4Kim JK, Park SY, Shon JH, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT [J]. Radiology, 2004, 230(3): 677-684. 被引量:1
  • 5Hafron J, Fogarty JD, Hoenig DM, et al. Imaging characteristics ofminimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations[J].Urology, 2005, 66(6): 1155-1159. 被引量:1
  • 6Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Magno C, et al. Contrast-enhanced second harmonic sonography in the detection of p seudocap sule in renal cell carcinoma[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 182(6): 1525-1530. 被引量:1
  • 7吴玮,沈建.小肾癌的超声造影与增强CT对照研究[J].浙江中医大学学报,2011,35(5):693-695. 被引量:1
  • 8Reitsma JB,las AS,Rutjes AW,et al.Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58(10):982-990. 被引量:1
  • 9Fan L,Lianfang D,Jinfang X,et al.Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in solid renal parenchymal lesions with maximumdiameters of 5 cm[J].J Ultrasound Med,2008,27(6):875-885. 被引量:1
  • 10Xu ZF,Xu HX,Xie XY,et al.Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma:differential diagnosis with real-time contrast-enhancedultrasonography[J].J Ultrasound Med,2010,29(5):709-717. 被引量:1

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部